Soviet union discouraged religion.
Explanation:
While th<u>e Soviet union never outright outlawed religion it was a firm believer in the fact that a true communist society would be one in which religion has no place. </u>
<u>As such, religious property was confiscated and religious leaders often got harassed. </u>
The state policy was to promote atheism in the new generation through schools and other modes of education and closing down of mass gatherings of religious nature.
Here you go!
1) Checks and Balances- This idea is implemented in the Constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. For example, the legislative branch(Congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (President). If the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. Vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. This check on power ensures that Congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.
2) Anti-Federalists do not want to ratify the Constitution unless it includes a Bill of Rights. The Anti-Federalists are worried that the Constitution gives too much power to the federal government. Having a strong central government caused problems when the US was still part of Great Britain. This is why the Anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.
3) Federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix America's weak political structure. Before the US Constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the Articles of Confederation. This constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.
Answer:
C. The excuse ‘you all did it too’ would not be a valid excuse for crimes against humanity.
D. Individuals can be held responsible for their actions, and cannot claim they were following their superior leadership orders.
Explanation:
With the Nuremberg Trials, several principles that were arranged prior to them started off. The Intentional Military Tribunal was formed, setting rules as to what, how, and who can and should be charged for war crimes against the humanity. Two of the basic principles that were established were that excuses/defenses from the type of ''you all did it too'' will not be accepted as valid, and that every individual can be charged for war crimes, despite claims of orders from their superiors.
Answer:
im not shure but the answer might be C sorry if im wrong :)
