Answer:
He would fool Clinton into thinking the Continentals were planning to attack New York while instead sneaking away to the south to attack Cornwallis
Explanation:
<u>Ethics and morals</u> refer to our beliefs about what is right vs. wrong, good vs. evil, virtuous vs. corrupt. Read more about ethics and morals.
<h3>What are considered as standard ethics and morals?</h3>
Ethics and morals conform to “right” and “wrong” conduct. While they can be used interchangeably, they are as well different.
<h3>What are the differences in ethics and morals?</h3>
Ethics refer to rules provided by an external source, e.g., codes of conduct in workplaces or principles in religions. Moral, on the other hand, refer to an individual's own principles regarding right and wrong.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about ethics and morals: brainly.com/question/1326871
#SPJ12
- The most true statement is that <u>D) </u><u>Shia Muslims</u><u> appear to be the </u><u>minority group</u><u> within </u><u>Islam</u><u>.</u>
- The best explanation for the split between Sunni and Shia is that it was over<u> D) A </u><u>disagreement </u><u>over the</u><u> leadership</u><u> of the</u><u> Islamic world</u><u> </u><u>after </u><u>the </u><u>death </u><u>of the </u><u>prophet Muhammad.</u>
The map is not included but it is accurate that the Shia are a minority in Islam because:
- Sunnis comprise 87% - 90% of all Muslims
- Shia comprise 10% - 13% of all Muslims
The Shia are therefore heavily outnumbered by the Sunni who have used their dominant position to occasionally marginalize the Shia.
The reason the Shia and the Sunni split was because they could not agree on who would lead the Muslims after the Prophet Muhammed died. Sunni wanted a man named Abu Bakr to lead and the Shia wanted Ali ibn Abi Ṭalib.
In conclusion, Islam has two main denominations which are the Sunni and the Shia but the Sunni outnumber of Shia who had split from the Sunni because they could not accept their choice for Muhammed's successor.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/1483771.</em>
Answer: A - As a store of value, which facilitates the accumulation of wealth and value over time
Explanation: Money is defined as a medium of exchange and as a store of value. Money is anything that can be used as an exchange for goods and services. There are various functions of money and they are:
1. Medium of exchange - it can be used to settle all transactions for goods and services.
2. Measure of value - it can be used to measure the worth of goods and services.
3. Store of value -it can be stored now for the future. It is a way to store up wealth for the future.
I believe the correct answer is the following one - <span>Yes, since the mistake would be obvious to a reasonable person.
Anyone presiding over this case would see that the store had nothing to do with this, and that it isn't really a huge crime as it was obviously just a mistake. So, the store wouldn't be held liable for a small mistake that one of its employees made.
</span>