Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": extends the law of one price to a group of goods.
Explanation:
Purchasing Power Parity or PPP compares different country's currencies through a market basket of goods approach. Two currencies are in PPP when a market basket of goods, taking into account the exchange rate, is priced the same in both countries.
The Law of one price states that individual and identical goods or services will have the same price if there were no friction between global markets. Thus, <em>the PPP approach would be the extent of the law of one price adding the exchange rates.</em>
Answer:
The correct answer is A) geographic organization
.
Explanation:
A geographic organization of a corporation is a structure that is used more than anything else in the sales area, and where it seeks to massify and maximize the process of insertion and sale of a product taking into account the characteristics of each country. Experts with international experience are generally hired within this distribution, which allows for a more or less successful process, but not before carefully studying the market in order to achieve the proposed objectives.
1 - an orginization or buisness that provides a service
2 - Provides what the consumer is looking for
Answer:
Current ratio will be overstated
Explanation:
Current ratio measures the short term solvency of a firm. In other words, it measures the ability of the firm to meet its current obligations. It is the ratio of current assets to current liabilities.
A part of long term liability that is to be paid this year is considered current liabilities. If today's fashion continues to report debt due in the current year as long term liability, then current liabilities reported would be lesser than the actual position. As such, current ratio calculated would be higher than what it is actually. So, current ratio will be overstated in this case.
Answer:According to the article, when companies earn patents specifically to prevent competition, it hinders the innovation of products that might actually be better. For instance, Bruce Nolop describes how his company had to pay more attention to the "minefield of existing patents than on the expected value that we could bring to customers." Rosabeth Moss Kanter suggests a "use it or lose it" solution to this problem. She thinks that a company that patents an item would be forced to use the patented idea or product or risk losing the patent. This idea would encourage more competition and prevent patent abuse.
Explanation:
