1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivenika [448]
3 years ago
10

Who is in charge of organizing and running an election?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Aleksandr-060686 [28]3 years ago
3 0
This answer would candidate
You might be interested in
Some theoretical traditions in psychology maintain that biology and nature are all important in shaping human development and ad
s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

nativists would be least likely to emphasize the role of experience

6 0
3 years ago
In what year did Israel become an independent nation? A. 1066 B. 1901 C. 1948 D. 1965
hoa [83]
Israel became a state on May 14, 1948 when they declared independence with the neighboring Arab states.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
3 years ago
Write a letter to a soldier thanking them for their service in the military
pickupchik [31]
I thank you for absolutely everything you have done to our country and within our country there is no way we can repay you for your service.
8 0
3 years ago
Which statement about parental influence on children's prosocial behavior is true? Group of answer choices Only direct modeling
Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

C). Parents' communication of prosocial values is related to children's adoption of the value of prosocial behavior.

Explanation:

<u>Prosocial behavior is described as the social behavior that aims to help people, show concern and feelings for them, think about their welfare, and benefit society as a collective whole</u>.

As per the question, the third statement regarding the parental influence on kids' social behavior is true as the children learn from their parents only if they wish to learn. <u>The parents are able to communicate the prosocial values only if the children are able to adapt it in their behavior accordingly</u>. Thus, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 4. List and explain the other two ranks of the Order of Canada.
    8·1 answer
  • Why did President Johnson believe that Reconstruction should accomplish?
    5·1 answer
  • Which mode of transportation invented in the 1800s was made possible by the distilled petroleum product called gasoline?
    13·2 answers
  • What is freedom of religion?
    7·2 answers
  • What happened to runaway slaves who escaped to Florida? (5 points) A. Hunted by Osceola in exchange for rewards from the United
    10·2 answers
  • Polar climate in terms of its location,climate, vegetation and lifestyle.
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP! 20 POINTS!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • Which is the main region of mexico and covers much of the central part of the nation?
    6·2 answers
  • Greek leader that created a new council to help the assembly.
    6·1 answer
  • Is a fallen, rottings tree considered an abiotic or biotic factor?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!