The 15th Amendment to the Constitution granted African American men the right to vote by declaring that the "right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude."
The liberals (a) favor the government taking a prominent role in the economy, and strongly supports civil rights for minorities and marginalized groups.
Answer:
The correct answer is: An individual thinking "I'm smart".
Explanation:
In psychology, internal causes can be defined as the perception that individuals have about their behavior is due to personal and internal characteristics rather than by external causes and/or events.
For instance:
James scored 4 goals on his Sunday soccer match when asked about the goals he said that it was because he practices soccer every day and he tries to be the best at the game.
He considers himself to be very good at soccer and that's why he scored 4 goals in a single match which shows an internal cause.
In this particular case, an internal cause for making a good grade on a psychology test can be that the individual who got the good grade thinks that he is smart.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Your answer is b hope it’s right
