Answer:
The correct word for the blank space is: product life cycle.
Explanation:
The product life cycle is the period of time during which a product is conceived and developed, brought to market and late removed from the market. The cycle includes four (4) stages: <em>research and introduction, promotion and growth, maturity, </em>and <em>decline</em>.
Answer:
Objective and task budgeting method
Explanation:
The objective and task method refers to a budgeting method where a business allocates a certain marketing budget in order to achieve specific objectives, instead of simply allocating a marketing budget based on percentage of sales revenues.
Doodle set its specific goals:
- increase the sales of its basic steel pins by 10%
- increase the awareness of its glow-in-the-dark pins
And then it allocated $1.5 million for marketing expenses.
Answer:
"4"
Explanation:
Human relations approach to employees management believes that employees are not only motivated by financial incentives but other factors like praises , interpersonal relationship and delegation of roles and this in return , boost their commitment.
The managers are involved in active support of employees' growth and performance.
It underscores the importance interpersonal and social relationship in a work environment.
Answer:
300 shares
Explanation:
Based on Family attribution rules the rules often requires that the family attribution should occur between parents, their children and grandchildren, regardless of their age.
But based on the information given in which Panda Company is owned equally by Min, her husband, Bin, her sister Xiao, and her grandson, Han in which each of them hold 100 shares in the company which means Under the family attribution rules we would excludes Min sister Xiao from the shares.
Hence, the shares of Panda stock that Min is deemed to own will be:
Min +husband Bin + her grandson Han =3 individual
100 shares ×3=300 shares
Therefore Under the family attribution rules, 300 shares of Panda stock is what Min is deemed to own
Answer:
NSB Co. won the case against Mid-American oil/Mid-American oil lost the case
Explanation:
The original contract clearly stipulated that any modifications to the contract were to be written and signed by the company's presidents, therefor the decision by the Mid-American executive to talk with the purchasing agent of NSB Co. was in breach of the contract in two aspects;
- The parties that made the modifications were not the ones agreed to in the contract
- They made the modifications verbally while the contract stated that the changes were to be written and signed
