Answer: Halo effect
Explanation:
In psychology the halo effect is a sort of bias in which a person tries to impress others through his/her overall appearance. The more good your appearance looks, the better your chances would be in impressing others.
In the question, many people wear formal attire because that signifies a level of good appearance that would land them a job. Even though it is not require, the candidate are doing that to get the attention of the interviewer in a way that would help them get the job.
Answer:
lean production means the management in which cutting out waste but the quality is maintained. this is helpful in reducing costs .
Answer:
C
Explanation:
In this question, we are looking at what would be the later effect of the Congress taking steps to make sure that there is an increase in the amount of returns on savings for example, say the amount of interest rate on saved money is increased.
What will happen in this case is that the equilibrium interest rate would be lower while the equilibrium quantity of loanable funds will be higher. What he meant by the equilibrium interest rate is that it is the interest rate at which the amount of money demanded is equal to the amount of money supplied.
Due to the legislation by congress, it is expected that more money would be supplied in terms of bank deposits as people would want to make a higher profit off the legislation. The effect of this is that the equilibrium interest rate will be lower as its balance would have been upset my the availability of more deposits and less demand.
We also say that the equilibrium level of loanable funds will be higher. This is because there would be more money present in the vaults of the bank as savings have been encouraged and people are expected to fill the bank with more money. This thus means the bank has more money to throw around via loans as there is an increase in the amount of savings. This surely would drive up the equilibrium quantity of loanable funds
Answer:
Right now marcantuone and robert gieson ought not be held at risk for what the drycleaner inhabitants did.Because there was no release of perilous substance during their ownership.The chlorinated dissolvable pollution issue right now the aftereffect of dry cleaning activity led preceding the condemnee's acquisition of the property.There was no proof of a release of unsafe substance during the time of condemnee's ownership.The sullying was not found until after the condemner had procured the title to the property in the judgement activity.
As indicated by the spill demonstration the obligation is vested on a condemner who bought debased property and didn't attempt any assessment or examination at the hour of procurement.
Answer:
the required return on the preferred stock is 3.33%
Explanation:
The computation of the required return on the preferred stock is shown below:
= Dividend ÷ Selling price per share
= $2.50 ÷ $75
= 3.33%
Hence, the required return on the preferred stock is 3.33%
We simply applied the above formula