The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
Are a group of related languages all derived from Vulgar Latin within historical times and forming a subgroup of the Italic branch of the Indo-European language family.
Answer:
Lowering taxes.
Explanation:
Lowering taxes is the policy should the government adopt for the promotion of large scale industries because if there is low taxes on the industries the people are attracted due to high chances of profit. The government also provide other necessities such as water and other raw materials etc that promotes large scale industries and as a result economic growth of the country occurs.
Answer: Many thinkers have pointed out that philosophy is a search for wisdom.
Explanation:
The German philosopher Josef Pieper advocates this idealistic approach in defining philosophy as the search for wisdom. This principle is also present in the ancient philosophers Pythagoras and Plato, who said that philosophy is a quest for wisdom with a huge love dose. Philosophy as a quest for wisdom at the beginning of that quest emphasizes that no one can have complete and absolute knowledge of the things he seeks. In this context, one must intensively search, read, and educate them to reach a certain level of wisdom.
Randy was a simple guy. Always minding his own business and carrying on with his day. But today wasn't like any other day. He felt as if something weird was about to happen. He was walking down the street when he heard a loud bang around the corner. As he turned, he spotted two men walking in. He was curious and wanted to know what was going on. Randy walked up to the building and he opened the factory door. He peeped inside and saw some light shining from afar. Who could possibly be in there? The last shift was over about 3 hours ago. No one goes in there once it's closed! "Could it be thieves?" he asked himself. As he stepped in, alarms went off. What was he to do now? The police came as soon as they could and he got arrested for trespassing. In the end, his day wasn't like any other day. - This is 157 words! I hope this helped!
