By virtue of their familiarity in a foreign country or region, IGOs and NGOs are a valuable source of information for a Joint Task Force commander who may have neither access to nor current information about the affected country or region.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:
</u>
NGOs and IGOs are sources of information when certain forces do not tend to have the same. NGOs and IGOs are known for collecting information about the affected country or region. They consist of specialized people who have a better understanding or idea of what kind of data they are going to collect.
Although they tend to collect such data, they hardly disclose the same as it is for their purpose. Moreover, it is difficult to rely on data published by the government due to a lack of accuracy.
It's the practical-ish solution for individuals seeking monetary remedies too low in proportion to attorney fees, and requiring more legally binding enforcement measures than those provided by mediation/arbitration. The ish suffix indicates that it's not the democratized "people's court" that everyone thinks it is... We've found that it's not very useful for low-income, immigrant or shy folks which either don't feel confident enough, or are so ensnared by the legal system that they never think small claims court a viable solution for their problems.
<span>It also plays a great entertainment role, apparently, given the popularity of daytime shows such as that of the assertive Mrs. Judge Judy.</span>
<span>as people age, they think less and less about being married to their spouse, and more about their individuality.
This is disengaged.
</span>
C. United States v Nixon.
"The President wants me to argue that he is as powerful a monarch as Louis XIV, only four years at a time, and is not subject to the processes of any court in the land except the court of impeachment." Sirica denied Nixon's motion and ordered the President to turn the tapes over by May 31.
