Answer:
The Supreme Court held that his free speech rights were not violated. ... Holding: Random drug tests of students involved in extracurricular activities do not violate the Fourth Amendment. ...
Explanation:
They argued that the states could nullify federal court decisions if they felt that the ... The Constitution did not give the Court this power.
Answer:
B, C, and E.
Explanation:
Got it right on Edge 2020. Trust me.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The one thing that is wrong with Mr. Jacobs' conclusion is that he has failed to consider that there can be other possible explanations for his results.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The fact that Mr. Jacobs conducted a 're-test' with the same questions in the test can be deemed to be a possibility behind the results of the tests having come out positive.
- Other than that, it can be considered that not the new method of physical education, but some other activity done by the students over the span of 8 months might have made the students better at the test.
This is true due to the circumstances some inmates are targeted more answer is A
