Answer:
1. move
2. kept from
Explanation:
1. move - she had a stroke and was paralysed, thus she was unable to move her body from the neck down
2. kept from - the passage mentions, "Suddenly, Hamamoto was unable to dance." the injury kept her from continuing to dance — it was a physical constraint instead of a mental one
i hope this helps! :D
Answer: For, there is nothing more important and more essential that the original self.
The correct answer is <span>what is written in the Constitution is not open to interpretation
Strict constructionism is a way of interpreting the constitution. Constructionists only accept what is written and the way in which it was written. There is nothing beyond what is written and from his point of view, if it says that all people are equal and citizens of the United States then all people indeed, including African-Americans. For him, there is no interpretation that looks at deeper meaning, what is written is what is intended and that's why he is a strict constructionist. </span>
Not sure about number three in regards to the literary movement; however, i can help you with the last two.
"the collars belonging to the cats" -- there are multiple collars, and multiple cats. the way to represent this is "the cats' collars." you add the apostrophe to the cats, because the multiple cats own the collars.
"the notebooks belonging to Janet" -- here, you have multiple notebooks, but only one janet. the way to show this is "Janet's notebooks." the possessive s is added to janet's name to show that the notebooks are hers. the possessive s or apostrophe would not apply to notebooks, because the notebooks don't own anything. only janet owns something.
