Answer:
Accrual basis accounting
Explanation:
Under Accrual basis of accounting, income is recognized when it is earned and not when actual cash is paid or received.
Under cash basis of accounting, income is only recognized when actual cash is received.
Accrual basis of accounting ensures transactions pertaining to a period are recorded in that period and it depicts more accurate financial picture unlike in cash accounting wherein income for a period might be overstated or understated.
Following cash basis of accounting is not in accord with both US GAAPs (generally accepted accounting principles) and IFRS.
The approaches would be the best way for Charice to communicate this to her manager is Send an email to her manager requesting a meeting to talk in person about her concerns. Mark the importance level as high. Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions here.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Harold will win his case because the employer was aware of the racially harassing behavior, yet no discipline was imposed.
Explanation:
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (<em>EEOC</em>) is an agency of the federal government of the United States that enforces laws against race, color, religion, sex, age, or disability discrimination in the workplace. Most employers and unions are covered under EEOC laws.
In Harold's case, the harassment was not specifically against him but there were clear signs of discrimination. However, Alegius Financial Services did not do anything regarding this issue what will result in finding the company liable after Harold sued them.
Answer:
There are two types of profit and costs in nay business, which are accounting costs/profit and the economic costs/profits.
Accounting costs include everything that is tangible or the monetary costs a firm pays, while the economic costs include the cost which is intangible(Opportunity costs) as well as tangible.
Here in this question, the profit of the firm therefore is,
a. From an accountant;s definition = 130000-(6000+42000+7000) = 75000.
b. From an economist's definition = 130000-(6000+42000+7000+65000+6000) = 4000.
Hope this helps you. Thankyou.
Answer:No, Lake source cooling is not economically advantageous.
Explanation:
The cost of the lake source cooling is S30 greater than the cost of the refrigerator.
Though the lakes source option will bring additional income of S2400 for ten years this will only reduce it's cost to S2900 and this is still higher than the total cost of the refrigerator option of S2,120.
The straight line depreciation option on both options will not change this decision since it will have the same effect on both options.
