The answer is option C. Number of double covalent bonds between carbon atoms is responsible for causing different shapes of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids. The double covalent bond causes kink in the unsaturated fatty acids because of which their stacking is disrupted and they become loosely packed. The problem with double covalent bond is that unlike single covalent bond it can't rotate and has almost cis-configuration. This is also the reason behind their liquidity at room temperature.
Bb × bb = 2 Bb : 2 bb = 1 Bb : 1 bb
Thus, the phenotypic ratio would be 1 Dominant Phenotype : 1 Recessive Phenotype.
<span> For a start, when you have a question that needs answering in science, you formulate a null hypothesis. That is a negative statement which you then set out to prove or disprove. This is just a convention. So if your initial question is for example, "Does sugar dissolve in water?"
Your null hypothesis will be "Sugar does not dissolve in water."
You then set up your experiment and get some data.
Now if your data doesn't support your null hypothesis then you reject it and make the statement ,"Sugar does dissolve in water." As you can see from this simple example, a non-result is still a result so the idea of formulating new tests as mentioned by another answerer isn't necessary and in some ways is the incorrect thing to do. In science, hypotheses are often not supported by data and i would argue that this is the case a lot of the time. A non-result is still a result and you will have plenty to write about whichever way it goes. </span>
Answer:
<em>The correct option is A) Do not let your personal beliefs interfere with the truth; do not omit facts even if they contradict your hypothesis or your goals; avoid bias; do not make up data; do not plagiarize; give credit to others if you cite their work.</em>
Explanation:
Ethics and scientific research go hand in hand. If intellectual honesty and ethics are not maintained during scientific research, then this field could raise many ethical concerns.
Modifications in results are strictly against ethics during scientific research. A scientist should never try to manipulate the results so that it supports their hypothesis. Cheating or stealing other peoples work is also not acceptable in the scientific world. A scientist should always be modest.