1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klemol [59]
3 years ago
5

fear of punishment reduces hostile aggression in adolescent. Do you agree or disagree with this stance? Support your answer with

the help of logical reasons and examples.
Social Studies
1 answer:
zzz [600]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:I disagree

Explanation:Children or teenagers at the adolescent age are openly willing to test boundaries and they will rebel against any form of punishment .

It doesn't create any fear to them what punishment you want to apply on them most of the time it is better to sit and talk or find disciplinary measures that will be constant during this stage but trying to inflitrate any fear upon them usual never works.

You might be interested in
HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I WILL GIVE 25 POINTS!!!!!
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Sanctuary Cities are abhorrent at best, and the reason is simple. One could back these ideas purely on principal, but instead the state and local governments that enact these sanctuary laws are doing so with only political motivation in mind. Much like every mass shooting, or every time something bad happens in our nation. The political dilemma we face is that these acts or carried out without pure intentions.

Pandering to a base by way of violating laws sets a terrible precedent going forward. it suggests that here our laws are different and "that line in the sand can move". what is a nation of laws which doesn't enforce them. The answer is a nation without a spine. A law is a law, and while one might disagree with the laws, and that is why we have a proper way of enacting changes we want to see done in our great nation.

This has been done with Marijuana in multiple states already, however cities and local governments do not hold a vote to allow residents to have a say. No, instead they declare the city as being a sanctuary, and depend on mob rule to force those who oppose into silence or to force them out of the city entirely.

If we want to make it easier for people to attain visas and green cards, let's have that discussion and vote on it. if we want to make the US open borders, let's have a discussion and vote on it. but to simply say "to hell with you" and violate the law of the land without the say so from the citizens of state and local municipalities is mob rule at best and a violation of the oathes of offices taken by those we elect into those offices.

Personally, I believe that it is too hard for immigrants to attain visas and green cards, and that isn't to mention the financial cost ranging in the thousands for a single person going through this process. I believe this system requires change and needs revision, but it is wrong to declare sanctuary cities and states. one because it is done with motivation of pandering to a base for political gain, and lastly it sets a precedent for lawlessness in our greater country and local and state governments.

If we are to be a nation of laws, then we must be a nation of laws and not lawlessness. If we are to be a nation of suggestions, then we should carry on as we are currently doing. I love to do what feels right, but it must be done in the right way, otherwise you add fuel to the fires of division in our nation, and as Abraham Lincoln once famously stated; "A divided house cannot stand".

5 0
3 years ago
In the context of understanding human behavior julian rotter and walter mischel objected to the explanation that
lisov135 [29]
The two scholars contended that human behavior is not consistent as laymen and professional psychologists views it. They argued that research shows that behavior is not consistent. This inconsistency according to them is consistent and therefore can be used to predict human behavior.
6 0
3 years ago
Ebbinghaus found that most of the information stored in memory:
KengaRu [80]
Is lost over time when there is no attempt to retain it.
8 0
3 years ago
What is a real world example of complex personhood
kramer

Answer:

The moral sense of personhood denotes individual beings who are moral agents. Moral agents engage in behavior that can be evaluated as moral or immoral, as morally right or wrong, as morally permissible or morally impermissible. Their acts are blameworthy or praiseworthy.

4 0
2 years ago
Hi,
Radda [10]
Nah bro what is it for
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Your hairstylist says that she is an agnostic, that is, she is not sure if there is a god. although you have not asked her, how
    12·1 answer
  • What are you called if you are from argentina?
    9·2 answers
  • Explain the advantages and disadvantage of interdependence and independence for Cuba.
    7·1 answer
  • Japanese art reflected beliefs from which of the following philosophies: a. Shinto c. Hinduism b. Buddhist d. both a and b Pleas
    8·1 answer
  • What skills are the Bantu noted for
    11·1 answer
  • The Federalist Papers supported the passage of the U.S. Constitution. Name one of the writers.
    15·2 answers
  • Explain four benefits of primary production<br>​
    13·2 answers
  • How did FDR use radio to get his message to the American people and to build hope and
    11·1 answer
  • How did politicians view the nhs?
    13·2 answers
  • Which u. S. State holds the record for the oldest living trees?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!