A group environment that promotes arousal and anonymity would be the ideal social context for deindividuation
<h3 /><h3>What is the social context?</h3>
The specific circumstance or broad context that serves as a model for a person's or a group's behavior. The background usually has a minimal impact on the actions and feelings that occur in this environment.
When people feel they can't be individually recognized, a phenomenon known as deindividuation occurs, which manifests as impulsive, aberrant, and occasionally aggressive behavior.
In this, the people may act the way in which the surrounding environment is behaving.
Learn more about the social context, here:
brainly.com/question/21208547
#SPJ4
Answer: a. quid pro quo harassment
Explanation: In legal terms, a quid pro quo is a form of sexual harassment that can be found mostly in working places. It is a situation where one is of a superior position or standing and demands sexual relations as a favor from the other. It is commonly known as "this for that" or "scratch my back and i scratch yours" with sexual relations as the catalyst.
I hope this helps.
1. I believe the role of community in reducing crime is not to actively catch the criminals, but through the act of helping those in need within their community.
When members of the community help each other, people wouldn't be in a situation where they struggle to find food.
This alone will dramatically reduce the number of crimes.
2. I believe it's because there is nobody that dare to say and ackonwledge their community has a problem because of the fear of being judged.
Somebody need to step up and openly say that members of community that conducted the criminal acts must be shamed and encourage those who don't to work together and develop their own economy.
Answer:
moral hazard
Explanation:
<em>Moral hazard</em> appears in markets with asymmetric information. It corresponds to an opportunistic behavior where one of the sides seeks its own benefit at the expense of the other which is being unable to observe their behavior. The entity assumes more risks in its investments because the profits will be for them while the losses will be assumed by the other side. Those who suffer the negative part, cannot do anything because there is no perfect information and do not know the exact intentions.
