Answer:
Candidate Screening
Explanation:
Candidate Screening process is one of the human resource function through which the top managers works for selecting the best candidate's applications out of all those applications received. It involves screening that is going through the candidates resumes and cover letters.
It is a method through which skimming is done that is rejection of the unrequired candidates is done. Under such a method the candidate's screening is done keeping in mind the qualifications and experience of the candidate fit for the required post in the organization.
It is a negative process because it involves rejection of the candidates applications.
An unfavorable materials quantity variance indicates that the actual usage of materials exceeds the standard material allowed for output.
<h3>What do you mean by material quantity variance?</h3>
The material quantity variance refers to the difference between the standard amount and the actual amount of materials used in the production process.
The material quantity variance yield unusual results as it is based on a standard unit quantity that is not even close to the actual usage.
Therefore, an unfavorable materials quantity variance indicates that the actual usage of materials exceeds the standard material allowed for output.
Learn more about Material Quantity variance here:
brainly.com/question/15082996
#SPJ1
Answer:
The best recommendation to be made to this client is to do nothing.
Explanation:
Investment in stock is a highly risky investment because price of stock often fluctuates which can make an investor to lose a lot of money.
From the question, the client is already old at age 67 with a low income and he does not have any other liquid assets apart from the annual income of $25,000, mainly from social security and interest on funds held in a bank savings account.
Since losing so much money through investment in stock is not affordable to him, the best recommendation to be made to this client is to that he should do nothing.
Answer:
The criticism is true to a certain degree, and unjustified to another degree.
Explanation:
It is true in the sense that the U.S. has indeed lost a lot of manufacturing to Mexico, simply because Mexico has far lower labor costs, and U.S. manufacturers have decided to take advantage of that by taking their plants to Mexican states.
It is also true that Mexico has been running a trade surplus with the United States in recent years, mainly because of the large manufacturing sector that Mexico has been developing.
On the other hand, the criticism is unjustified because neither a trade deficit nor the moving of manufacturing to Mexico mean that the United States as a whole is in worst condition than before NAFTA. In fact, most economists agree that free trade is a good thing for the economy as a whole, and that most people benefit from the lower costs and specialization that trade brings about.
The problem lies then, in the people who lose their jobs: formerly unionized manufacturing workers from the Rust Belt, for example. These people need to be helped with government assitance, both in terms of welfare, and training, so that they can find new jobs and make ends meet in the meanwhile.
If its true or false question then true i think.
