Answer:
has a fair market net worth sufficient to sustain the risks of the program.
Explanation:
FINRA is an acronym for Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. It is a non-profit agency in the United States of America, which is saddled with the responsibility of handling the licensing and regulation of broker-dealers in securities.
A direct participation program (DPP) can be defined as a financial security which gives an investor (customer) access to the cash flow and tax benefits of a business venture.
Under FINRA rules, to recommend a direct participation program (DPP) to a customer, the registered representative must ascertain and ensure that the customer has a fair market net worth that is considered to be sufficient to sustain the risks associated with the program, including loss of investment and lack of liquidity.
Answer: This means: "d. Your economic profit has gone down and your accounting profit has stayed the same."
Explanation: The difference between the accounting and economic benefit is associated with the type of cost that each includes:
The accounting benefit is nothing more than the difference between income and cost. In this case it is still $50000.
The economic benefit includes not only explicit costs. The economic benefit is the difference between income and total costs (explicit and implicit). Therefore, this benefit is less than the accounting benefit. Because in this case the cost of working at home is considered.
Answer:
The amount of $25,000 will be recorded as the Cash Dividends
Explanation:
The amount which is to be recorded as the cash dividend is computed as:
Cash Dividend = Number of Shares × Rate per share
where
Number of shares is computed as:
Number of shares = Issued Shares - Treasury Stock
= 30,000 - 5,000
= 25,000
NOTE: No dividend is paid on treasury stocks, so the the shares of the treasury stocks are subtracted.
Rate per share is $1
SO, Putting the values above:
Cash Dividend = 25,000 × $1
= $25,000
Same as with Canada which is where both my grandfathers came from. Let's see how many reasons I can come up with just off the top of my head and just for those two.
- They enjoyed the freedom of the First Amendment (speech, press, religion, assembly -- Canada has the same provision) that was not granted in the country they left. They never exercised those rights, I don't think, but their children and grandchildren did.
- They were free to raise their children so that they had the chance of being productive. My father was an MD, but he owed that piece of good fortune to his father. The country from which they came would never have allowed him to get all that education.
- They were able to eventually bring their wives and children with them. There was enough money to be made, even at jobs that didn't pay much, to bring them across the Atlantic.
- They were able, once the families were here, to turn their attention to bettering their conditions. They never became rich, but no one starved either. That's more than could be said about those relatives who didn't do as they did.
- They were free to travel. They didn't do that, but their children and especially their grandchildren did. That too was very limited where they came from.
- They had medical care and good medical care which was not given to just anyone where they came from.
True, because producer decisions are motivated by the attempt to earn profits.18. Consider the following statement: “Competition is the disciplinarian of the market economy.”This statement istrue, because when producers face competition they are driven to provide goods and services at the lowest possible cost.19. Some large hardware stores such as Home Depot boast of carrying as many as 20,000 different products in each store. This volume of goods is the result ofthe choice of consumers regarding what to purchase to satisfy their wants and the choice of producers regarding what to produce to maximize profits.
