Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option B.
The court has a duty to protect student's right to free speech.
Explanation: Based on the situation if a person agree to the dissenting opinion in this case would support that court has a duty protect the student's right for freedom of speech.
Because censoring the student's speech regarding on any issue violates the right of a citizen's freedom of speech. Like on the name of teaching moral and political value if the conversation of the students is stifled then it is the violation of their right.
Because the state can not enact any law which is violating the freedom of speech. If it happens in any case the court has the duty to make sure the freedom of speech of the student.Because the court can intercept the law.
In the 1840s, the U.S was struck with the idea of <em>manifest destiny</em>. An idea that America should control North America from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean. Mexico had the legal right to Texas thus dominated California, Arizona, and New Mexico. Two territories stood in America's way of accomplishing the manifest destiny idea; first, the Oregon Territory that was occupied by both Great Britain and the United States and the Western and Southwestern areas owned by Mexico. The differences between the United States and Mexico over the border of Texas led to the Mexican American War that resulted in American gaining ownership of Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas. The ownership of these territories fulfilled the '<em>Manifest Destiny' </em>of the U.S stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific, Manifest Destiny.
Answer:
The answer is B) The flow of goods entering the U.S. was reduced significantly.
Explanation:
As the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was implemented bu USA, more than 25 countries increased their tariff rates on American goods.
This drastically affected the international trade and the global commerce as a whole negatively.
And the inflow of goods to the USA was decreased as the businesses and importers were already struggling with the great depression and was unable to afford the new tariffs and prices.
It led to recognition of post-traumatic stress as a legitimate psychological ailment
By exposing the citizen armies of Europe to prolonged and extreme
danger, World War One generated psychological casualties on an
industrial scale. This, in turn, created a military crisis that drew
doctors from a diverse range of specialties into the field of mental
health; never before had so much attention been focused on a single
psychiatric disorder.
