Alexander Hamilton was very concerned about what might occur if the
Constitution wasn’t adopted. He had seen firsthand the difficulties this
country faced with the weak plan of government created by the Articles
of Confederation. He worried that our financial issues would make it
difficult for us to succeed as a country. He worried about our
government being able to keep order at home. He feared we would continue
to be viewed as a weak..
Answer:
Aight, I am so so so sorry if I get this wrong, normally I wouldn't answer a question I'm not 100% confident about, but it seems like nobody else is gonna answer soooo
William Hartsfield was the 49th and 51st mayor of Atlanta, Georgia. He served six terms, longer than any other person in the city's history. He is credited with developing Atlanta into an aviation powerhouse and with building its image as "A City Too Busy to Hate".
The boll weevil, introduced to the state in 1915, greatly reduced state cotton yields. Georgia's cotton acreage declined from 5.2 million acres in 1914 to 2.6 million in 1923. Overproduction in other parts of the country and foreign competition increased the supply of cotton and decreased the price.
The three governors controversy (governor race of 1946) was a political crisis. Three men made claims to the governorship: Ellis Arnall, the outgoing governor, Melvin E. Thompson, the lieutenant governor-elect, and Herman Talmadge, Eugene Talmadge's son.
Though I'm sure you know this one, Pearl Harbor was a surprise aerial attack on the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor on Oahu Island, Hawaii, by the Japanese that precipitated the entry of the United States into World War II.
In conclusion, I'ma take a wild guess and say that the boll weevil and the bombing of pearl harbor seem like the most likely answers.
Really hope this helps!
Alan Hall suggests hiring three new workers utilizing seven categories. Competence, capability, compatibility, commitment, character, culture, and pay are some of these criteria.
<h3>
What changes should he implement? How?</h3>
- Rethink his position within the business; Oliviera must acknowledge that he cannot affect change alone. Making the staff feel like they are a part of the family
- learning about the initial place of employment, the staff, and having a meeting with the person in charge of each operating field. Oliveira looks for chances for operational improvement that could be used to boost store performance.
- A Democratic recommendation- A democratic approach of leadership can effectively drive team members to work together in contrast to more passive leadership styles like laissez-faire and bureaucratic. Initially, Daniel's leadership should be democratic.
- Using flattery, fostering goodwill, projecting modesty, and making nice requests are all examples of friendliness.
- Use of a direct and aggressive attitude, such as commanding others to follow instructions, reminding them repeatedly, demanding compliance with requests, and emphasizing that rules must be followed.
- Asking for suggestions, fixing difficulties, complimenting, disclosing personal information, and listening are examples of style-based supportive behaviors. According to Harvard Business School professor John Kotter, management is about handling complexity.
- By creating formal plans, creating tight organizational structures, and tracking results against the plans, good management creates order and consistency.
Learn more about Style of leadership: brainly.com/question/11236113
#SPJ4
Here is information for both perspectives:
Federalists
I would support the federalists because they believed in a strong central government that would help to unite the states. Along with this, the creation of a new stronger federal government would help to solve the problems America faced under its first constitution, the Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government could not tax or even raise an army. With the new US Constitution, the federal government would have these necessary powers in order to ensure safety within American society.
Anti-Federalists
I would support the Anti-Federalists because they were advocates of states rights. Along with this, the Anti-Federalists knew that a central government with too much power could very easily result in a monarchy, much like the one the United States experienced when controlled by Great Britain.
