1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
navik [9.2K]
4 years ago
5

What is the extended ratio relating the side lengths of a 45-45-90 triangle?

Mathematics
2 answers:
Zanzabum4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

RIGHT ANGLES

Step-by-step explanation:

There are two types of special right triangles, based on their angle measures. The first is an isosceles right triangle. Here, the legs are congruent and, by the Base Angles Theorem, the base angles will also be congruent. Therefore, the angle measures will be 90∘,45∘, and 45∘. You will also hear an isosceles right triangle called a 45-45-90 triangle. Because the three angles are always the same, all isosceles right triangles are similar.

crimeas [40]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A x:x:x radical 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

The others are for the triangle 60-30-90 degrees

You might be interested in
Why is 2+2=4? And not 3?
Len [333]

Answer:

beacuse 1+2=3

Step-by-step explanation:

because basic math says so......idk

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Given a set of cards numbered 101 through 200. If you draw one card, what is the probability the card's number will be divisible
pshichka [43]

Answer:4

Step-by-step explanation:

I don’t know I just chose a answer

4 0
3 years ago
Anyone willing to answer this?
dexar [7]

Answer:

D:he deposits $10 per week

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
since the $39 is the price after a 25% discount, it does not represent 100%. What percent does it represent?
yanalaym [24]

Answer:

75%

Step-by-step explanation:

$39= x-(0.25x)= 0.75x

A 25% discount takes off 0.25 of the price.

x= original price

To find the original we use something like the above equation

5 0
3 years ago
the roots of a quadratic equation are 5 and 2/3. if one of the two factors is x-5, what could be a second factor? explain your r
den301095 [7]

As the Remainder Theorem points out, if you divide a polynomial p(x) by a factor x – a of that polynomial, then you will get a zero remainder. Let's look again at that Division Algorithm expression of the polynomial:

Advertisement

p(x) = (x – a)q(x) + r(x)

If x – a is indeed a factor of p(x), then the remainder after division by x – a will be zero. That is:

p(x) = (x – a)q(x)

In terms of the Remainder Theorem, this means that, if x – a is a factor of p(x), then the remainder, when we do synthetic division by

x = a, will be zero.

The point of the Factor Theorem is the reverse of the Remainder Theorem: If you synthetic-divide a polynomial by x = a and get a zero remainder, then, not only is x = a a zero of the polynomial (courtesy of the Remainder Theorem), but x – a is also a factor of the polynomial (courtesy of the Factor Theorem).

Just as with the Remainder Theorem, the point here is not to do the long division of a given polynomial by a given factor. This Theorem isn't repeating what you already know, but is instead trying to make your life simpler. When faced with a Factor Theorem exercise, you will apply synthetic division and then check for a zero remainder.

Use the Factor Theorem to determine whether x – 1 is a factor of

    f (x) = 2x4 + 3x2 – 5x + 7.

For x – 1 to be a factor of  f (x) = 2x4 + 3x2 – 5x + 7, the Factor Theorem says that x = 1 must be a zero of  f (x). To test whether x – 1 is a factor, I will first set x – 1 equal to zero and solve to find the proposed zero, x = 1. Then I will use synthetic division to divide f (x) by x = 1. Since there is no cubed term, I will be careful to remember to insert a "0" into the first line of the synthetic division to represent the omitted power of x in 2x4 + 3x2 – 5x + 7:

completed division: 2  2  5  0  7

Since the remainder is not zero, then the Factor Theorem says that:

x – 1 is not a factor of f (x).

Using the Factor Theorem, verify that x + 4 is a factor of

     f (x) = 5x4 + 16x3 – 15x2 + 8x + 16.

If x + 4 is a factor, then (setting this factor equal to zero and solving) x = –4 is a root. To do the required verification, I need to check that, when I use synthetic division on  f (x), with x = –4, I get a zero remainder:

completed division: 5  –4  1  4  0

The remainder is zero, so the Factor Theorem says that:

x + 4 is a factor of 5x4 + 16x3 – 15x2 + 8x + 16.

In practice, the Factor Theorem is used when factoring polynomials "completely". Rather than trying various factors by using long division, you will use synthetic division and the Factor Theorem. Any time you divide by a number (being a potential root of the polynomial) and get a zero remainder in the synthetic division, this means that the number is indeed a root, and thus "x minus the number" is a factor. Then you will continue the division with the resulting smaller polynomial, continuing until you arrive at a linear factor (so you've found all the factors) or a quadratic (to which you can apply the Quadratic Formula).

Using the fact that –2 and 1/3 are zeroes of  f (x) = 3x4 + 5x3 + x2 + 5x – 2, factor the polynomial completely.   Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 2002-2011 All Rights Reserved

If x = –2 is a zero, then x + 2 = 0, so x + 2 is a factor. Similarly, if x = 1/3 is a zero, then x – 1/3 = 0, so x – 1/3 is a factor. By giving me two of the zeroes, they have also given me two factors: x + 2 and x – 1/3.

Since I started with a fourth-degree polynomial, then I'll be left with a quadratic once I divide out these two given factors. I can solve that quadratic by using the Quadratic Formula or some other method.

The Factor Theorem says that I don't have to do the long division with the known factors of x + 2 and x – 1/3. Instead, I can use synthetic division with the associated zeroes –2 and 1/3. Here is what I get when I do the first division with x = –2:

completed divison: bottom row:  3  –1  3  –1  0

The remainder is zero, which is expected because they'd told me at the start that –2 was a known zero of the polynomial. Rather than starting over again with the original polynomial, I'll now work on the remaining polynomial factor of 3x3 – x2 + 3x – 1 (from the bottom line of the synthetic division). I will divide this by the other given zero, x = 1/3:

completed division:  bottom row:  3  0  3  0

This leaves me with the quadratic 3x2 + 3, which I can solve:

3x2 + 3 = 0

3(x2 + 1) = 0

x2 + 1 = 0

x2 = –1

x = ± i

If the zeroes are x = –i and x = i, then the factors are x – (–i) and x – (i), or x + i and x – i. I need to remember that I divided off a "3" when I solved the quadratic; it is still part of the polynomial, and needs to be included as a factor. Then the fully-factored form is:

3x4 + 5x3 + x2 + 5x – 2 = 3(x + 2)(x – 1/3)(x + i)(x – i)

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is 3/7 less than 2/14?
    8·2 answers
  • Which times and distances are represented by the function?
    10·1 answer
  • A store sells two different types of coffee beans; the more expensive one sells for $8 per pound, and the cheaper one sells for
    15·1 answer
  • 33. A competition question requests students to form a three-digit number.
    10·1 answer
  • What is 22/7 out to 4 places? What is pi
    7·1 answer
  • Suppose babies born after a gestation period of 32 to 35 weeks have a mean weight of 2700 grams and a standard deviation of 900
    10·1 answer
  • After Kwan spent $5 of the money he earned for mowing lawns, he had $15 left. Which equation represents how to find the amount K
    12·2 answers
  • Kindly help me please tq​
    13·1 answer
  • A company has an annual electric bill of $495,000. Of that amount, 3/5 was billed
    5·1 answer
  • A small business has 50 total employees, 15 of which are full-time. What percent of the employees are part-time?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!