1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jasenka [17]
3 years ago
10

the roots of a quadratic equation are 5 and 2/3. if one of the two factors is x-5, what could be a second factor? explain your r

easoning.​
Mathematics
1 answer:
den301095 [7]3 years ago
4 0

As the Remainder Theorem points out, if you divide a polynomial p(x) by a factor x – a of that polynomial, then you will get a zero remainder. Let's look again at that Division Algorithm expression of the polynomial:

Advertisement

p(x) = (x – a)q(x) + r(x)

If x – a is indeed a factor of p(x), then the remainder after division by x – a will be zero. That is:

p(x) = (x – a)q(x)

In terms of the Remainder Theorem, this means that, if x – a is a factor of p(x), then the remainder, when we do synthetic division by

x = a, will be zero.

The point of the Factor Theorem is the reverse of the Remainder Theorem: If you synthetic-divide a polynomial by x = a and get a zero remainder, then, not only is x = a a zero of the polynomial (courtesy of the Remainder Theorem), but x – a is also a factor of the polynomial (courtesy of the Factor Theorem).

Just as with the Remainder Theorem, the point here is not to do the long division of a given polynomial by a given factor. This Theorem isn't repeating what you already know, but is instead trying to make your life simpler. When faced with a Factor Theorem exercise, you will apply synthetic division and then check for a zero remainder.

Use the Factor Theorem to determine whether x – 1 is a factor of

    f (x) = 2x4 + 3x2 – 5x + 7.

For x – 1 to be a factor of  f (x) = 2x4 + 3x2 – 5x + 7, the Factor Theorem says that x = 1 must be a zero of  f (x). To test whether x – 1 is a factor, I will first set x – 1 equal to zero and solve to find the proposed zero, x = 1. Then I will use synthetic division to divide f (x) by x = 1. Since there is no cubed term, I will be careful to remember to insert a "0" into the first line of the synthetic division to represent the omitted power of x in 2x4 + 3x2 – 5x + 7:

completed division: 2  2  5  0  7

Since the remainder is not zero, then the Factor Theorem says that:

x – 1 is not a factor of f (x).

Using the Factor Theorem, verify that x + 4 is a factor of

     f (x) = 5x4 + 16x3 – 15x2 + 8x + 16.

If x + 4 is a factor, then (setting this factor equal to zero and solving) x = –4 is a root. To do the required verification, I need to check that, when I use synthetic division on  f (x), with x = –4, I get a zero remainder:

completed division: 5  –4  1  4  0

The remainder is zero, so the Factor Theorem says that:

x + 4 is a factor of 5x4 + 16x3 – 15x2 + 8x + 16.

In practice, the Factor Theorem is used when factoring polynomials "completely". Rather than trying various factors by using long division, you will use synthetic division and the Factor Theorem. Any time you divide by a number (being a potential root of the polynomial) and get a zero remainder in the synthetic division, this means that the number is indeed a root, and thus "x minus the number" is a factor. Then you will continue the division with the resulting smaller polynomial, continuing until you arrive at a linear factor (so you've found all the factors) or a quadratic (to which you can apply the Quadratic Formula).

Using the fact that –2 and 1/3 are zeroes of  f (x) = 3x4 + 5x3 + x2 + 5x – 2, factor the polynomial completely.   Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 2002-2011 All Rights Reserved

If x = –2 is a zero, then x + 2 = 0, so x + 2 is a factor. Similarly, if x = 1/3 is a zero, then x – 1/3 = 0, so x – 1/3 is a factor. By giving me two of the zeroes, they have also given me two factors: x + 2 and x – 1/3.

Since I started with a fourth-degree polynomial, then I'll be left with a quadratic once I divide out these two given factors. I can solve that quadratic by using the Quadratic Formula or some other method.

The Factor Theorem says that I don't have to do the long division with the known factors of x + 2 and x – 1/3. Instead, I can use synthetic division with the associated zeroes –2 and 1/3. Here is what I get when I do the first division with x = –2:

completed divison: bottom row:  3  –1  3  –1  0

The remainder is zero, which is expected because they'd told me at the start that –2 was a known zero of the polynomial. Rather than starting over again with the original polynomial, I'll now work on the remaining polynomial factor of 3x3 – x2 + 3x – 1 (from the bottom line of the synthetic division). I will divide this by the other given zero, x = 1/3:

completed division:  bottom row:  3  0  3  0

This leaves me with the quadratic 3x2 + 3, which I can solve:

3x2 + 3 = 0

3(x2 + 1) = 0

x2 + 1 = 0

x2 = –1

x = ± i

If the zeroes are x = –i and x = i, then the factors are x – (–i) and x – (i), or x + i and x – i. I need to remember that I divided off a "3" when I solved the quadratic; it is still part of the polynomial, and needs to be included as a factor. Then the fully-factored form is:

3x4 + 5x3 + x2 + 5x – 2 = 3(x + 2)(x – 1/3)(x + i)(x – i)

You might be interested in
The label on a bag of chocolates states that there are 0.384 pounds of chocolates.
charle [14.2K]

<u>Answer:</u>

<u>Answer:The chocolate are 0.0042 lighter than the stated on the label</u>

4 0
2 years ago
If your breakfast costs $12 and you are
lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

find 9% of 12

12 times 9 divided by 100

108/100

$1.08

12+1.08

Your mean costs $13.08

-Have a nice meal!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
@mehek14
gayaneshka [121]
X=cost per hamburgurs
y=cost per hot dog

200x+150y=1450
200x+250y=1750

we can multiply first equation by -1 and add to 2nd

-200x-150y=-1450
<u>200x+250y=1750 +</u>
0x+100y=300

100y=300
divide both sides by 100
y=3

sub back

200x+150y=1450
200x+150(3)=1450
200x+450=1450
minus 450 both sides
200x=1000
divide both sides by 200
x=5


the cost of a hamburgur is $5
the cost of a hot dog is $3
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Would the balance be positive or negative if this happened:
natka813 [3]
A- positive
B-negative
C-positive
A was positive because 5-2 would be positive 3.
B was negative because 8-12 would be negative 4.
C was positive because -5+8 is positive 3.
4 0
3 years ago
Linnea has drawn a line from one corner of a rectangle to the opposite corner the line divides each of the right angles into two
allochka39001 [22]
The answer is B, the two triangles are congruent but are orientated differently
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Express the ratio 48:44 in its simplest form
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is true?
    6·1 answer
  • What measure of center should Mr. Malloy use for Amo and for Javier for the best possible grade?
    7·2 answers
  • What is (1.6x + 7.3) + (–0.6x + 2) – (7.8 – 3.4x), simplified?
    12·2 answers
  • What are the solutions to -x^2+100x
    6·1 answer
  • I NEED HELP ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIST WHOEVER COMES FIRST Evaluate the expression if x = 9 and
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following equations is not equivalent to the others?
    6·1 answer
  • Simplify the expression. 8x^-10 y^'6 -2x^2y^-8 Write your answer without negative exponents.​
    15·1 answer
  • QUESTIONS
    9·1 answer
  • Amy ate of a pizza and Jack ate of a pizza. Which of the following is true?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!