Which following if ur writing about a company u should start like this
so ans so company id=s known for its good qualitty products
Answer:
1 - Non- fiction
2. summarizing
3. Title
4. Main idea
5. Infer
6. Compare
7. Contrast
8. Author
Explanation:
Author - the person who wrote the article or text.
Contrast - to tell how things are different.
Compare - to tell how things are alike.
Infer - to use information the author has given you plus your prior
knowledge to find the meaning of the text.
Main idea - what the text is mostly about.
Title - the name of the article or text
Summarizing - to make a brief statement about the essential ideas in a text
Non-fiction - writing that concerns real events and is intended to explain,
inform, persuade, or give directions.
Answer:
- They have unappealing connotations, which helps the speaker use a mocking tone to insult death by saying he is usually found in unappealing places.
Explanation:
Word-choice play a vital role in the conveying the intended meaning and message of the audience.
As per the question, the response i.e. 'They have unappealing connotations, which helps the speaker use a mocking tone to insult death by saying he is usually found in unappealing places' most evidently elaborates the influence of the words 'poyson, warre, and sicknesse.' The author conveys an unpleasant implication through these words that assists him to adopt a mocking attitude which maligns death('slave to fate') by asserting that it is generally found in dreary locations and places.
Answer:
If we're ignoring some of the options like your teacher said to do, then the answers are....
1. Literature (Refers to the story of Pinocchio)
2. Mythology (Refers to the Greek myth of the trojan horse)
3. Bible (Refers to the Bible)
4. Bible (Refers to the Bible)
5. Literature (Refers to a book/TV/Movie)
I honestly don't know what 3. and 4. are if they weren't the bible but it could be literature because the bible is a sacred text/book.
I hope I helped, Please correct me if I'm wrong!
Answer: whether its intent has been compromised.
The excerpt states that "reargument" was largely for the purpose of studying what were the exact circumstances surrounding the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. The reason why they want to study this is in order to determine what are the reasons that led legislators to pass the amendment. If that is successfully established, the judges will know what the intent of the amendment was, and whether this intent had been compromised.
