Find the remainder using long division. 4,598 ÷ 8 A) 2 B) 4 C) 6 D) 8

In triangle RST, m∠R > m∠S + m∠T. Which must be true of triangle RST? Check all that apply.

solmaris [256]

Answer:

1. m∠R > 90°

2. m∠S + m∠T < 90°

4. m∠R > m∠T

5. m∠R > m∠S

Step-by-step explanation:

<h3>General strategy</h3>

prove the statement starting from known facts, or
disprove the statement by finding a counterexample

Helpful fact: Recall that the Triangle Sum Theorem states that m∠R + m∠S + m∠T = 180°.

Option 1. m∠R > 90°

Start with m∠R > m∠S + m∠T.

Adding m∠R to both sides of the inequality...

m∠R + m∠R > m∠R + m∠S + m∠T

There are two things to note here:

The left side of this inequality is 2*m∠R
The right side of the inequality is exactly equal to the Triangle Sum Theorem expression

2* m∠R > 180°

Dividing both sides of the inequality by 2...

m∠R > 90°

So, the first option must be true.

Option 2. m∠S + m∠T < 90°

Start with m∠R > m∠S + m∠T.

Adding (m∠S + m∠T) to both sides of the inequality...

m∠R + (m∠S + m∠T) > m∠S + m∠T + (m∠S + m∠T)

There are two things to note here:

The left side of this inequality is exactly equal to the Triangle Sum Theorem expression
The right side of the inequality is 2*(m∠S+m∠T)

Substituting

180° > 2* (m∠S+m∠T)

Dividing both sides of the inequality by 2...

90° > m∠S+m∠T

So, the second option must be true.

Option 3. m∠S = m∠T

Not necessarily. While m∠S could equal m∠T, it doesn't have to.

Example 1: m∠S = m∠T = 10°; By the triangle sum Theorem, m∠R = 160°, and the angles satisfy the original inequality.

Example 2: m∠S = 15°, and m∠T = 10°; By the triangle sum Theorem, m∠R = 155°, and the angles still satisfy the original inequality.

So, option 3 does NOT have to be true.

Option 4. m∠R > m∠T

Start with the fact that ∠S is an angle of a triangle, so m∠S cannot be zero or negative, and thus m∠S > 0.

Add m∠T to both sides.

(m∠S) + m∠T > (0) + m∠T

m∠S + m∠T > m∠T

Recall that m∠R > m∠S + m∠T.

By the transitive property of inequalities, m∠R > m∠T.

So, option 4 must be true.

Option 5. m∠R > m∠S

Start with the fact that ∠T is an angle of a triangle, so m∠T cannot be zero or negative, and thus m∠T > 0.

Add m∠S to both sides.

m∠S + (m∠T) > m∠S + (0)

m∠S + m∠T > m∠S

Recall that m∠R > m∠S + m∠T.

By the transitive property of inequalities, m∠R > m∠S.

So, option 5 must be true.

Option 6. m∠S > m∠T

Not necessarily. While m∠S could be greater than m∠T, it doesn't have to be. (See examples 1 and 2 from option 3.)

So, option 6 does NOT have to be true.

4 0

1 year ago

Given: ABCD is a parellelogram. Prove: AB=CD and BC=DA'

alexgriva [62]

Parallelogram opposites side theorem which states that If a quadrilateral is a parallelogram , then it’s opposite sides are congruent

5 0

3 years ago

Siri am I a mix of recipe that calls for 1 1/2 cups of flour and 3/4 to get butter Jeremiah uses three sticks of butter how many

Inga [223]

Answer:

6 cups

Step-by-step explanation:

jeremiah 4× the recipe

3/4×4=3

so 1 1/2×4=6

8 0

3 years ago

PLEEEEEEEEEASE HEEEEEEEEELP

morpeh [17]

Answer:

distance island dock to Dock A = 4.99 km

distance island dock to Dock K = 6.35 km

Step-by-step explanation:

Always make a scetch to visualize the situation.

You need to construct two triangle both with a streight angle, so you can use Pythagoras to calculate the unknown distances between the island dock L, and each of the other two docks A an K.

I chose to introduce an extra letter, the letter C. In total you have the letters A K L and the letter C.

The letter C has a streight angle of 90° between ACL and it has the same streight angle of 90° with KCL. It is crucial that you see that the distance of LC is exactly the same in triangle LAC and that LC has exactly the same distance in the other triangleLKC.

The distance between AK = 2.3 km.

I define the distance between K and point C as 2.3 + x, because the distance x is unknown.

KC = 2.3 + x

Further more, when you make a picture, you can see that the distance between A and point C = x.

From such a picture, it would show clearly, that K is further away in respect to L then point A. From the picture it would be clear that the angle of LKC is smaller then the angle of LAC, so LKC = 45° and LAC = 64°.

Because angle LKC = 45° and we choose C to have an angle of 90°, the TRIANGLE LKC must be a special triangle... In any triangle, the sum of the three angles together, must add up to 180° .

If that is true, then we have 45 + 90 + 45 (because that adds up to 180). Now that means triangle LKC must have two equal sides (because of the same angels of 45° ).

So we know the distance KC = LC and we already defined KC = 2.3 + x.

Now we know enough to solve the problem.

AK = 2.3 km

angle of LKC = 45°

angle of LAC = 64°

AC = x

KC = 2.3 + x

LC = KC

LC = 2.3 + x

Try to calculate the distance x by using tan. After that you can use Pythagoras to find the other distances.

tan(LKC) = ( LC ) / ( KC )

tan(LKC) = ( x+2.3 ) / ( x+2.3 )

That is not helpful. Let's try the other triangle...

tan(LAC) = LC / AC

tan(LAC) = ( x+2.3 ) / x

tan(64) = ( x+2.3 ) / x

Solve the equation which means you try to find the value for x.

x * tan(64) = ( x+2.3 )

tan(64) * x -x = 2.3

tan(64) * x - 1* x = 2.3

Try to get x outside of the braquets...

x* ( tan(64) - 1 ) = 2.3

x* (2.0503038415793 - 1 ) = 2.3

1.0503038415793 * x = 2.3

x = 2.3 / 1.0503038415793

x = 2.19

Now use Pythagoras a² + b² = c² in triangle LAC to find distance LA.

LA² = AC² + LC²

AC = x = 2.19

LC = 2.3 + x = 4.39

LA² = 2.19² + 4.39²

LA = SQRT( 4.79 + 20.16 )

LA = SQRT( 24.95 )

LA = 4.99 km

Now use Pythagoras a² + b² = c² in triangle LKC to find distance LK.

LK² = KC² + LC²

KC = 2.3 + x = 4.39

LC = 2.3 + x = 4.39

LK² = 4.39² + 4.39²

LK = SQRT( 20.16 + 20.16 )

LK = SQRT( 40.32 )

LK = 6.35 km

7 0

3 years ago

3) Emma is great at the standing long jump. Her best jump is 10 feet 8 inches. How many

givi [52]

Answer:

128 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers