1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Diano4ka-milaya [45]
3 years ago
7

1. Which trading bloc is NOT made primarily of Latin American nations?

History
1 answer:
Lady_Fox [76]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached or another kind of reference, we can say that the trading block that is not primarily made of Latin American nations is NAFTA.

The North American Free Trade Agreement or NAFTA was signed in 1992 by the Presidents of the United States, México, and Cánada. NAFTA is the second largest free trade agreement after the European Union. It has favored free trade between the three countries and helped their economies. Recently reviewed by the Congress of the three countries, NAFTA changed to USMCA, the United States, México, and Canada Agreement.

You might be interested in
What type of group were the carbonari?
Irina18 [472]
The Carbonari (charcoal burners) were groups of secret revolutionary societies founded in early 19th-century Italy. The Italian Carbonari may have further influenced other revolutionary groups in Spain, France, Portugal and possibly Russia
6 0
3 years ago
I need help I really don’t know
Maurinko [17]

Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.

In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.

In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.

7 0
3 years ago
explain what the union navy and army did to maintain or make progress on steps 1 and 2 of the anaconda plan from 1862 to 1863
Andrej [43]
Step 1 of the Anaconda plan was to completely blockade all ports that were in any way related to the southern territories. They wanted to prevent them from getting help from outsider countries such as European countries which were willing to help the Southerners at the time. By blocking all ports, they would prevent them from ever leaving the territory. This step was conducted by the Navy.

Step 2 was about cutting it off from help from the Americas. It was about a continental blockade where the southerners would be surrounded from all sides, from Northern states in the north, to northern blockades in the East and West. They would occupy and block things like railroads or similar roads and would prevent anything from getting in or going out of the territory.<span />
5 0
3 years ago
How did Singapore grow to become a wealthy nation ?
butalik [34]

Answer:"I don't think any other economy," says Linda Lim, an economist at the University of Michigan, "even the other Asian tigers, have that a good a statistical record of rapid growth, full employment, with very good social indicators — life expectancy, education, housing, etc. — in the first 20 years," she says.

Lee Kuan Yew, the man who founded modern-day Singapore and died last week at age 91, led that economic transformation. One of the most influential leaders of the 20th century, Lee was an autocrat whose tiny island-state became one of the richest places in the world, and a role model for other governments in Asia and beyond.

Singapore has little land and no natural resources. But after its independence in 1965, the former British colony was transformed into a major manufacturing and financial center. The late conservative economist Milton Friedman described Singapore as an example of how to do development right.

"If you compare the conditions of people in a place like Singapore with the conditions of people in a place like red China or for that matter Indonesia, you will see that the economic freedom is a very important component of total freedom," he said on Free to Choose, a TV series first broadcast on PBS in 1980.

Conservatives see Singapore as a free-market success story. Low taxes, few capital restrictions and liberal immigration policies have made it one of the most cosmopolitan places on Earth.

"They have very, very free trade, very low tariffs [and] very few non-tariff barriers," says Josh Kurlantzick of the Council on Foreign Relations. "They'll boast about how you can start your own company in Singapore in three hours."

But like Deng Xiaoping's China, which emulated many of Singapore policies, Lee's government played a big role in the economy.

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Question 2 (5 points) What were the state governments like after the Revolutionary War?
belka [17]

Answer:

They had differing ideas about a powerful national government

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes the theme of a fictional text
    10·1 answer
  • The declaration of independence was written in order to gain the support of two crucial groups. what were they?
    9·1 answer
  • What did President Clinton believe would be a result of the North American Free Trade Agreement? increased jobs and lower prices
    8·2 answers
  • What were some of the challenges george washington faced as the first president of the united states of america?
    15·1 answer
  • The Columbian Exchange included all of the following except:
    8·1 answer
  • What are a few of the positive things the Equal Rights Amendment would have done for women in America?
    8·2 answers
  • How did the events of the Hundred Years' War (1337—1453) contribute to the development of national identity in Europe? (1 point)
    9·2 answers
  • how did the populists seek to rethink the relationship between freedom and government to address the crisis of the 1890s? why wa
    7·1 answer
  • The Jewish people who didn't convert to Catholicism were often forced to live in a undesirable part of the city referred to
    15·1 answer
  • Established in 1096, what was the first english-speaking university?.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!