The correct answer here would be B - adoption of cultural characterstics of the conquerors by the vanquished.
However, this was not neccessarily the case always as sometimes those who conquered could adopt some characteristics of those they conquered. However, in general, B would be the correct answer.
<u>"confirming that it is not an online source" </u>is wrong. The problem is not the fact the source is online, but if it's credible.
<u>"determining whether or not it is well-known" </u>well-known sources might still be wrong. Being known does not make something true.
<u>"d. determining whether it is a secondary source" </u>again, it has nothing at all to do with the validity of the source.
So the answer is:
b. checking its conclusions against other sources
The best way is to check the source and compare to different ones that talk about the same subject. Comparing different conclusions of different authors and seeing different points of view about the same thing is often the best way.
1 is correct. Laissez-Faire is the theory of no government intervention in trade. In the late 1800s there were a lot of wealthy big businesses, mainly corporations, that were causing the ruin of smaller ones. People who opposed big business called for government regulation of it. The supporters of big business attempted to justify it using Laissez-Faire.
Answer:
Judge Johnson's first major ruling was to join the majority on a three-judge panel that struck down the Montgomery bus-segregation law as unconstitutional, applying the principle of Brown v. ... He would use that reasoning again and again to create a broad mandate for racial justice in Alabama and across the South
Explanation:
this is what I found on the web