Israel, Europe / the Vatican tried to take it back
The correct answer is letter C
Locke initially advocated the need for a centralized government structure that would prevent disorder within society. His conservative and authoritarian vision also extended to the field of religiosity, at a time when he believed that the monarch should interfere in the religious options of his subjects. However, his interest in the field of philosophy gradually changed his views.
One of the fundamental points of his political thought changed considerably when the intellectual began to question the legitimacy of the divine right of kings. The work that essentially deals with this subject is entitled “Two Treaties on Government” and was published in the late 17th century. In his views, Locke advocated the establishment of political practices that were not against the natural laws of the world.
In addition, this prominent thinker observed many of his interests in the political field being themed within his country when he witnessed important events regarding the English Revolution. In his view, a power that did not guarantee the right to property and the protection of life could not have the means to legitimize its exercise. Still in this regard, he clearly stated that a government that did not respect these rights should be legitimately deposed by the population.
The cartoon from the 1900 publication was titled <em>"Divorce the Lesser Evil."</em>
- This was the argument of the Justice while the Church representative pleaded with the Justice to stop the fire being ignited against marriages with the immorality of divorce.
- This cartoon depicted the start of government interference or intervention in marriages by granting couples the legal right to divorce in the courts of law.
- From the artist's depiction, we can infer that marriage was being regarded as an unnecessary contract that could be terminated at will during government-sponsored and sanctioned divorce. From that period, Marriage started losing its covenant-for-life characteristics.
- At that progressive era, it was regarded as a better option to allow unhappy couples to go their separate ways and even remarry. There was no thought spared for the children of such unhappy marriages and divorces.
Thus, today, after more than 100 years, the results have been revised. Nations where divorce is allowed have multiplied in immorality. Families have been scattered. Children are adversely affected. And the world is not a better society.
Learn more about divorce at brainly.com/question/11286701