I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
In the 1900s, the National American Association for Women's suffrage prepared legislative amendments to the U.S. Constitution. This was their greatest advance towards their goal.
Answer:
the answer is the second ,shy
They passed the Espionage and Sedition Acts which allowed the government to arrest and fine anyone speaking out against the war.
Answer:
Oil money has improved the lives of people in Southwest Asia in the last 30 years. Life expectancy has increased and the number of deaths in infants have decreased. ... One goal is to have a steady supply of oil flowing out and money flowing in.
