Based on the reactions to the Marshall plan, the following are the explanations:
- Western Europe - It would lead to their economies recovering.
- Eastern Europe - Wanted their economies to recover as well.
- Soviet Union - Did not want to lose control of her Soviet satellites.
- United States - Would prevent Communism and increase American trade.
<h3>Why were nations opposed or in favor of the Marshall plan?</h3>
The plan saw the United States sending massive aid to European nations. Both Western and Eastern European nations needed it to rebuild their economy but the Soviet Union refused for the Eastern Europeans to access the plan.
The Soviet Union was worried that the plan would allow for the United States to gain influence in Eastern Europe and so were against it.
The Americans were in favor because a strong European economy meant that America could trade with them and it would also prevent Communism from spreading.
Find out more on the Marshall Plan at brainly.com/question/1373135.
militarism: Commiting to military
alliances: Friends of countries that help in wartime
imperialism: Desire to colonize, for glory, riches, or global domination
nationalism: Believing in your country's greatness
Japanese Imperialism led to colonizing parts of china, since it was mad at western powers colonizing china and pushing it out (hypocrisy). Italy was a rising economy, but bitter of not getting a fair share of land. German nationalism was at a high as the emerging Nazi (nationalist socialist) party was overturning the inflation ridding weimar republic. The failing alliance of the League of nations was falling apart quickly. Soon Japan, Italy, and germany turned to Imperialism, Fascism, Nationalism, and militarism and the world would find itself in another world war.
The administration faced political opposition in 1994 when Republicans took control of both houses of congress but Clinton was reelected in 1996, after a failed attempt at a health care reform.
D would be correct, yep.
City-states would be independent, but their power would extend very little outside of the city-states borders.
