Answer:
the last part of the question is missing, so I looked for it:
a. Randy received $2,200 of interest this year and no other investment income or expenses. His AGI is $75,000.
b. Randy had no investment income this year, and his AGI is $75,000.
a) Randy can deduct $31,575:
- the mortgage interest is deductible
- the car loan interest is not deductible
- he can deduct $4,725 - $2,200 = $2,525 as investment interest expense
b) Randy can deduct $29,050
- the mortgage interest is deductible
- the car loan interest is not deductible
- since he had no investment revenue, he cannot deduct any investment interest expense
Answer:
Cost of goods sold= $816
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Acme-Jones Corporation uses a weighted-average perpetual inventory system.
August 2: 24 units were purchased at $23 per unit.
August 18: 40 units were purchased at $25 per unit.
On August 29: 34 units were sold.
Weighted-average= (23 + 25)/2= $24
Cost of goods sold= 34*24= $816
Answer:
.b. It is appropriate to use the constant growth model to estimate a stock's value even if its growth rate is never expected to become constant
TRUE The multi-stage valuation considers different grow rates for the subsequent years
Explanation:
a. Two firms with the same expected free cash flows and growth rates must also have the same value of operations
FALSE as their cost of capital can differ.
c. If a company has a weighted average cost of capital WACC = 12%, and if its free cash flows are expected to grow at a constant rate of 5%, this implies that the stock's dividend yield is also 5%.
FALSE dividend yield is a relationship between price and dividend it doesn't considers the growth of the company, just current values.
d. The value of operations is the present value of all expected future free cash flows, discounted at the free cash flow growth rate
FALSE They are discounted at the difference between return and grow rate
e. The constant growth model takes into consideration the capital gains investors expect to earn on a stock.
FALSE It considers the capital gains as speculations
Answer:
b. 6 pairs of jeans per crate of olives; and
c. 4 pairs of jeans per crate of olives
Explanation:
Olives Jeans Trade off Ratio (Olives:Jeans)
Spain 1 3 1:3 or 0.33:1 (1/3 = 0.33)
Denmark 1 11 1:11 or 0.09:1 (1/11= 0.09)
Spain & Denmark have less opportunity cost & hence comparative advantage than each other, in Olive & Jeans respectively.
Spain will export Olives to Denmark (importer). Denmark will export Jeans to Spain (Importer). Trade will be gainful if they get exchange ratio better than domestic exchange ratio.
- '2 jeans pairs per olive crate' not gainful trade ratio for Spain, as it is getting more i.e 3 jeans pair per olive crate at its own domestic ratio.
- '13 jeans per olive' not gainful for Denmark, as 0.07 = (1/13) olive per jeans is worse than its own domestic ratio i.e 0.09 = (1/11) olive per jeans
'4 jeans pairs per olive crate' is gaining trade ratio for:
- Spain: As it gets 4 i.e more than 3 pairs of jeans per olive crate
- Denmark : As it gets 0.25 = (1/4) i.e more than 0.09 olive crates per pair of jeans
'6 jeans pairs per olive crate' is gaining trade ratio for:
- Spain: As it gets 6 i.e more than 3 pairs of jeans per olive crate
- Denmark : As it gets 0.16 = (1/6) i.e more than 0.09 olive crates per pair of jeans
Both of them are gainful trade ratios, but:
- 1olive:4 jeans is more gainful for Denmark, as it is gaining relatively more than domestic exchange rate (0.25 is more > 0.09 than 4 > 3).
- 1olive:6jeans is more gainful for Spain as it is gaining relatively more than domestic exchange rate (6 is more > 3 than 0.16 > 0.09)
The demand for cheap pizza will <span>decrease because demand for cheap pizza is negative related to income.
a relation could be considered as negative if the correlation between two events opposing one another. As students finds high paying job, they are now able to buy more expensive pizza, which means that a number of customers for cheap pizza will be decreased</span>
