Tonya and Pearl each completed a separate proof to show that alternate interior angles AKL and FLK are congruent. Who completed
the proof incorrectly? Explain.
Tonya's Proof
Statement Justification
1. line AB ∥ line EF with transversal segment GJ 1. Given
2. ∠AKL ≅ ∠GKB 2. Vertical Angles Theorem
3. ∠GKB ≅ ∠FLK 3. Corresponding Angles Theorem
4. ∠AKL ≅ ∠FLK 4. Transitive Property
Pearl's Proof
Statement Justification
1. line AB ∥ line EF with transversal segment GJ 1. Given
2. ∠AKL ≅ ∠GKB 2. Definition of Adjacent Angles
3. ∠GKB ≅ ∠FLK 3. Corresponding Angles Theorem
4. ∠AKL ≅ ∠FLK 4. Transitive Property
im pretty much rich with points here so 100 points i think each person gets 50 but im not sure anyways yea brainliest will be given if the answer has an explanation
Tonya's Proof
Statement Justification
1. line AB ∥ line EF with transversal segment GJ 1. Given
2. ∠AKL ≅ ∠GKB 2. Vertical Angles Theorem
3. ∠GKB ≅ ∠FLK 3. Corresponding Angles Theorem
4. ∠AKL ≅ ∠FLK 4. Transitive Property
Pearl's Proof
Statement Justification
1. line AB ∥ line EF with transversal segment GJ 1. Given
2. ∠AKL ≅ ∠GKB 2. Definition of Adjacent Angles
3. ∠GKB ≅ ∠FLK 3. Corresponding Angles Theorem
4. ∠AKL ≅ ∠FLK 4. Transitive Property
im pretty much rich with points here so 100 points i think each person gets 50 but im not sure anyways yea brainliest will be given if the answer has an explanation
1 answer:
You might be interested in
