Nate finds the language of the contract to buy bedroom furniture difficult to understand due to "procedural unconscionability".
<h3>What is
procedural unconscionability?</h3>
Unconscionability that results from the contract-making process rather than from a contract's terms that are inherently unfair or unreasonable
Examples of Procedural Unconscionability is-
- influencing an underprivileged party who would not have otherwise signed the contract to do so.
- minimising important clauses in contracts for the sake of the underdog.
- If one side uses threats of violence against the other party, his family, or friends, this is known as coercion.
Therefore, Procedural unconscionability is based on elements that deprive a party of a meaningful choice, such as customer ignorance or a significant amount of unclear fine print.
To know more about elements required in contract-making, here
brainly.com/question/8116487
#SPJ4
...............................................................................
Answer:
Relevant:
$5,500
$1,650
$7,700
Explanation:
The only data irrelevant is the first production cost. <u>The $4,400 is not relevant because it is a sunk cost. It will remain constant in both choices.</u> The other costs and income are relevant because they vary on each decision. The $4,400 should not be a part of the decision making process.
Answer: Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct Option: Lower than his opportunity cost of that good.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
In our case, if people obtained a good at a price that is lower than his opportunity cost of that good then he will be benefited from the trade.