Answer:
Intelligence has been defined in many ways: the capacity for logic, understanding, self-awareness, learning, emotional knowledge, reasoning, planning, creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving.
Answer:
The kind of corporate takeover technique implemented in the film is proxy fight.
Explanation:
A proxy fight is termed as a technique where two corporate factions ask the stakeholders for the proxy votes such that the right of voting is transferred.
In this case both the parties, the heiress as well as the opponent is asking for the right of vote from stakeholders so that they can decide the corporate future. This is the key feature of the proxy fight and thus this is the correct option.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": questions as statements.
Explanation:
Using questions as statements is a selling technique in which the salesperson allows the prospective buyers to lead the interview by their ideas about a project so they implicitly assume they are having the approval of the salesperson on their thoughts which will make them feel more comfortable about the product, thus, increasing the possibility of them making the purchase. Clerks must make sure that most of the ideas of the buyers match the product they are attempting to acquire no to give consumers a false expectation.
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
The quantity of bus rides demanded decreases by 2.5 percent. Hope this helps. :)
