1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inna [77]
3 years ago
13

Que ventajas tenía el sur

History
1 answer:
MrRissso [65]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Being closer to home, the South was able to keep their supply lines significantly shorter than the Northern ones, and so were able to get food, ammunition, and medicine to their soldiers much more quickly than the Northern army could.

or in Spanish

Al estar más cerca de casa, el Sur pudo mantener sus líneas de suministro significativamente más cortas que las del Norte, y así pudo llevar comida, municiones y medicinas a sus soldados mucho más rápido que el ejército del Norte.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
roosevelt used the technology of radio to restore the nations confidence which president used the technology of television to do
zimovet [89]

i think your answer is Harry Truman. Harry Truman gave the first televised presidential speech

6 0
4 years ago
A U.S. private saw Japanese planes on his radar during the Pearl Harbor attack. What happened when he warned his commander? Choo
maxonik [38]

Answer:

B) The commander said it was nothing.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
In 1946 turkey demanded joint control of the straits of the dardanelles with the soviet union true or false
Genrish500 [490]
Fales is the answer hoped this helped
6 0
4 years ago
Who wrote the biography of Harvey Milk?​
dybincka [34]

Answer:

Randy Shilts

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What do you think Native Americans believed about who owned this land and how it should be used?
Nina [5.8K]
I think they didn’t really have a judgement about who owned the land but had different tribes of different people, the different tribes might’ve had controversy against each other but that isn’t exactly known. Conflicts over the use and ownership of Native lands are not new. Land has been at the center of virtually every significant interaction between Natives and non-Natives since the earliest days of European contact with the indigenous peoples of North America. By the 19th century, federal Indian land policies divided communal lands among individual tribal members in a proposed attempt to make them into farmers. The result instead was that struggling tribes were further dispossessed of their land. In recent decades, tribes, corporations, and the federal government have fought over control of Native land and resources in contentious protests and legal actions, including the Oak Flat, the San Francisco Peaks Controversy, and the Keystone XL pipeline
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What motivated Europeans to come to the new world
    5·2 answers
  • BIG POINTS Help
    10·1 answer
  • What did Florence Kelley and W.E.B. DuBois have in common?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following best contributed to rural poverty?
    11·1 answer
  • How did imperialism contribute towards germany´s increasing anger with britain and italy?
    15·1 answer
  • How did J.P. Morgan justify his methods of doing business?
    11·1 answer
  • How did victory in the French and Indian War have negative results for the British?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the Act of Toleration of 1649?
    14·2 answers
  • ¿Cuáles eran los movimientos políticos posrevolucionarios?
    12·2 answers
  • What BEST explains why Homer Plessy went to court?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!