1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inna [77]
3 years ago
13

Que ventajas tenía el sur

History
1 answer:
MrRissso [65]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Being closer to home, the South was able to keep their supply lines significantly shorter than the Northern ones, and so were able to get food, ammunition, and medicine to their soldiers much more quickly than the Northern army could.

or in Spanish

Al estar más cerca de casa, el Sur pudo mantener sus líneas de suministro significativamente más cortas que las del Norte, y así pudo llevar comida, municiones y medicinas a sus soldados mucho más rápido que el ejército del Norte.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Describe how the industrial revolution affected the roles available to women in the 19th century
Hatshy [7]
They did not have ask much rights as other man hope these helps
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer only if you're sure :)
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]
I am pretty sure the answer is C)


I really hope this helps


Have a wonderful day!!

Brainlest please?
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use your judgment and your understanding of US history to select four events of greatest importance from the timeline. List the
Hunter-Best [27]

The correct answer to this open question es the following.

Although the question is incomplete and does not provide a list to elaborate on the timeline, we can say that the events that are important to understanding the Vietnam War are the following.

First, we have to understand what happened during the French colonization period in the region of Vietnam, which was known as French Indochina. The problems arose until the degree that the Soviet Union, China, and finally the United States had to intervene in the conflict between the two Vietnams.

During World War II, Vietnamese leader H* Chi Minh created the League for the Independence of Vietnam, and in 1945 he promulgates the independence of North Vietnam, establishing Communism.

That is when the US entered into the conflict because President Harry Truman was decided to stop the Soviet Union and its spread of Communism. The US supported South Vietnam. China and the USSR supported North Vietnam.

In 1954, the Geneva Accords established the border between North and South Vietnam. Ngo Dinh became the leader of South Vietnam. In 1961, President John F. Kennedy sent troops and helicopters to Vietnam.

In 1964, after the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the US Congress authorized more powers for the US President to use the force against North Vietnam.

In 1965, President Johnson send more troops to Vietnam, but in America, people started to question the US involvement in that war. By 1967, young people, students, and citizens if the US took the streets and protest against US participation in the Vietnam War.

In January 1968, the Tet Offensive represents a major set back for the US.  Richard Nixon became President of the US in November 1968. President Nixon started what was known as Vietnamization, and order some US troops stationed in Vietnam to return to the US.

8 0
3 years ago
Is a secular outlook on the world an essentially modern phenomenon, or does it have precedents in the second-wave era?
Pepsi [2]
It seems like we have a number of precedents in the past as well. <span>For example Confucianism is a popular philosophy found in Chinese culture, looking at the teachings given by the Confucius it seems it had more of a practical and worldly approach than religious, the reason why Chinese elite were struck by the phenomenon. Another example is of Greek rationalism from where even the modern Western philosophy and secular thoughts seem to emerge. According to this religion had its own dominion separating scientific and philosophical issues. Similarly, legalism can be another example.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
The modern United Kingdom and France, by virtue of most government power being held by the central, national government, are bes
koban [17]
Here is some info G....The modern United Kingdom and France, by virtue of most government power being held by the central, national government, are best described as having the unitary form of government 
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was life like for upper class Roman Citezen
    6·1 answer
  • Carter’s foreign policy was characterized by a moral approach to issues?
    11·1 answer
  • Which event did these the assassination of archduke Franz Ferdinand immediately create?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did James Madison invite the thirteen states to a meeting in the fall of 1786?
    11·2 answers
  • What was significant about ancient Chinese art ​
    8·1 answer
  • Spices come from all over the world. In the left column, write where four spices came from and in the right column, write what t
    6·1 answer
  • Why did Boston authorities decide to arrest many of the farmers? (Shay’s rebellion)
    6·1 answer
  • I NEED HELP PLEASE ILL MARK BRAINLIEST
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the south oppose the tariff of abominations?
    10·1 answer
  • What are the rights and responsibilities of a citizen in a democracy?<br> Write essay?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!