Based on the MSRB pay to play rule, the contribution by the finance professional to the candidate b. cannot exceed $250.
<h3 /><h3>What is the MSRB pay to play rule?</h3>
This is a rule that governs financial dealings in municipalities between those in the municipal securities business and the non affiliated persons. 
One of the rules states that a finance professional that is registered in a municipality cannot contribute more than $250 to a candidate running for Mayor as it might cause bias. 
Find out more on the MSRB pay to play rule at brainly.com/question/14229649
#SPJ1
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The correct statement lies in option C. 
Monopolies negatively affect consumers.
Explanation:
- The statement that best captures the economic message of the cartoon is that monopolies negatively affect consumers. 
- When a specific enterprise or person is the only supplier in the market, it is called monopoly. 
- Monopoly can result to higher prices of the good, also known as price taker as there is no other enterprise which can supply the same good.
- Here, Santa Claus is the monopoly as he is the only supplier of gifts in Christmas so he gets sloppy and result in low output in his work.
 
        
             
        
        
        
D neither the investsmeant advice nor the investment adviser representatives are required to reregister
 in the state
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Because naturally within a market the equilibrium price is trying to be reached, (besides price ceilings and floors imposed by the government), Sellers will naturally push the price downwards because they must compete with each other to make a living. Thus answer C. is correct. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
b. $103,345
Explanation:
Assets = Liabilities + Owner's Equity
Owner's Equity (Year 1) = $908,100 - $267,845
                                        = $640,255
Owner's Equity (Year 2) = $980,279 - $233,892
                                         = $746,387
increase in Owner's Equity = Owner's Equity (Year 2) - Owner's Equity (Year 1)  
                                              = $746,387 - $640,255
                                              = $106,132
Net income during Year 2 = Increase in Owner's Equity - Additional investment + Withdrawals
                                             = $106,132 - $28,658 + $25,871
                                             = $103,345
Therefore, the amount of net income during Year 2 is $103.345.