Answer:
Present value = $21,804 (approx)
Explanation:
Given:
Periodic payment = $3,200
Number of period = 12
Interest rate = 10% = 10/100 = 0.1
Present value = ?
Computation of Present value:
![Present\ value = PMT[\frac{1-(1+r)^{-n}}{r} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{1-(1+0.1)^{-12}}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{1-(1.1)^{-12}}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{1-0.318630818}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{0.681369182}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 21,803.6188](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Present%5C%20value%20%3D%20PMT%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2Br%29%5E%7B-n%7D%7D%7Br%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2B0.1%29%5E%7B-12%7D%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281.1%29%5E%7B-12%7D%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-0.318630818%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B0.681369182%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%2021%2C803.6188)
Present value = $21,804 (approx)
Answer:
The correct answer is "evoked set"
Explanation:
An evoked set is a term that refers to the capacity of a customer to choose a specific brand because the customer reminds a product of a previous marketing campaign that takes effect on him.
The essence of marketing campaigns is to establish their business brand firmly on the market.
Example: When a person purchases a specif brand because it appeared on the tv, radio, newspaper... Sometimes the customer doesn't know why he chose this brand, just know that he likes it. (Probably for a marketing campaign)
Non-organic food is cheaper, and often has brand names, which appeal to the consumer more than an organic brand does.
Answer:
To enforce this promise we need to analyse whether there has been any agreement or contract between Sarah and Odessa and whether the same can be enforced.
Explanation:
In Sarah's case, her offer to gratuitously pay the neighbor for assisting in the house fire is not an enforceable contract. When the neighbor rushed to help in the fire, the offer to pay $1,000 had not yet been extended. When Sarah did extend the offer to pay $1,000, there was no consideration exchanged between both parties. The consideration, putting out the fire, had already occurred without the offer or acceptance of a contract.
Consider an alternate scenario. Sarah's house was on fire, and she could not wait for the fire department. She ran to her neighbor's house, begged for help, and offered $1,000 in exchange for neighbor's assistance. After hearing Sarah's plea, the neighbor agrees to assist in extinguishing the fire. This constitutes a contract; an offer, consideration, and acceptance.
I know one of them is disruptive technologies, hope that one answer helps!!
