We end up realizing that it is worthless. Ecc. 1 says that. And this may not be the answer you're looking for, but it isn't a wrong answer.
Back then, these individuals had no rights and were treated like absolute trash, far less than human. These individuals would drop off their children in institutions that had disgusting living conditions (e.g.. Willowbrook Institution) or just leave them out on the streets to fend for themselves. However, in today's perspective, these individuals have more rights than they did back then. They are considered more human and now have a voice in their own affairs, sometimes the government is in charge of some of these individuals.
They both promised fair to grow up as rude as savages; the young master being entirely negligent how they behaved, and what they did, so they kept clear of him.
He would not even have seen after going to church on Sundays, only Joseph and the curate reprimanded his carelessness when they absented themselves; and that reminded him to order Heathcliff a flogging, and Catherine a fast from dinner or supper.
Hindley in a passion told us to bolt the doors, and swore nobody should let them in that night.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
For example, the pronoun "he" implies that the subject is singular in number.
Hope this helps you as much as intended.
