The options available
A. masculine courage
B. socialization
C. virtue
D. pride in manhood
Answer:
Masculine courage
Explanation:
The Option B is not correct, because Socialization deals basically with interactions of individuals, by mixing with others, and learning to live according to the standard of the society.
The Option C is not, because Virtue has to do with behavior of an individual, that is morally accepted
The Option D is not correct either, because the act of Rudy is not that of pride.
However, Rudy, which is a guy, is trying to show that he is a "man" and he is courageous amd can keep going, regardless of whatever happens or despite having just been treated from concussion.
Hence, the right answer is MASCULINE COURAGE.
Answer:
worked in factories , textile factories, coal mines, glass factories, canneries, and many other types of work environments.
Explanation:
The failure to think independently and realistically as a group because of the desire to enjoy consensus and closeness is. group think.
What do you mean by group think?
Group think is a phenomenon that occurs when the desire for group consensus overrides people's common sense desire to present alternatives, critique a position, or express an unpopular opinion. Here, the desire for group cohesion effectively drives out good decision-making and problem solving.
Why is group think important?
Group consensus can allow groups to make decisions, complete tasks, and finish projects quickly and efficiently—but even the most harmonious groups can benefit from some challenges. Finding ways to reduce group think can improve decision-making and assure amicable relationships within the group.
Characteristics of Group think:
Rationalization of decisions to minimize objections. Belief in the absolute goodness of the group. Intense dislike of outsiders – stereotyped and misleading portrayals of outside members and those who have left the group
Learn more about group think:
brainly.com/question/10698713
#SPJ4
Answer:
For not receiving any financial help from the grantees, senator Kauffman hands were not tied neither was he unburdened or pressured by the outside forces to undermine the white collar crime investigations.
Step-by-step explanation
In the US the elites that is the political class, bankers and the individual funders do have influence over the State representatives due to their huge donations used in campaigns. In this case Senator Kaufman did not campaign but rather was appointed hence he did not receive any financial help from any third party, therefore his only commitment was to deliver the work he was appointed for.
This differs from other leaders because their allegiance is swayed as they try to please their donors for example; elected officials who received donations from NRA went against the bills that would limit their access to particular weapons.
