Answer:
correct option is C. $250,000
Explanation:
given data
sold the home and gain = $300,000
to find out
amount of the gain allowed to exclude from gross income
solution
we know that Michael owned the property for the 10 years
so here Michael is not allowed to exclude the gain = 10 % that is $30,000
and The maximum gain exclusion permitted = $250000
so here Michael will recognize $50,000 because amount exceed $250,000 for a single taxpayer and exclusion of gain on sales of property tax payer need to own and occupy the property as principle residence for the 2 out of 5 year immediately preceding the sales
so here correct option is C. $250,000
Answer: A bank complies with the necessary permits to manage the resources of its clients.
Explanation: Banks must have a minimum level of liquidity to answer for the money they keep and for that security is that the rates paid are lower. As for a vehicle loan or corporate loans, they maintain the necessary terms and conditions so that the client can pay the fair interest and the documents are formal compared to the companies that grant loans without backing.
Answer:
Explanation:
Given information
Number of shares owned = 200 shares
Split ratio = 2 for 1
Number of additional shares = 200 shares
The additional shares would get when the investor received the new certificate which specifies the additional shares plus the old certificate is also with the investor which decreased the par value of each share.
It is a cheaper method as compare to cancel the shares plus issuing them
Answer: Materiality
Explanation: In simple words, materiality refers to the accounting concept which states that only those transaction should be recorded in the financial statements which are important to the stakeholders.
In other words, the transactions should be recorded in such a way that it gives some value to the stakeholders.
Therefore, in the given case, steve reported two expenditures in the fiancial statement as the amount is significant, thus,must be holding the value to stakeholders.
Hence the correct option is D.
Answer:
1. Per se application - US Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of US competition law
2. Misuse of activity - EU Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of EU competition law
3. Extraterritoriality - US and EU
Justification: It is a provision of US and EU antitrust and competition law
4. Trade obstacle, non-tariff - France
Justification: These are considered to be part of the France trade system
5. Strict liability - U.S. Tort Law
Justification: It is part of the U.S. Tort Law and depends on intent to harm liability
6. Punitive damages - U.S. Product Liability Law
Justification: It is a provision of U.S. Product Liability Law