1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vilka [71]
3 years ago
8

The cost of goods sold for Michaels Manufacturing in the current year was $233,000. The January 1 finished goods inventory balan

ce was $31,600, and the December 31 finished goods inventory balance was $24,200.
1. Cost of goods manufactured during the period was ________.

a. $288,800

b. $233,000

c. $225,600

d. $240,400
Business
1 answer:
VMariaS [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: d. $240,400

Explanation:

To calculate the Cost of Goods sold for the year we simply add the Opening Balance of Finished goods to the Cost of Goods for the year and then subtract the Finished goods balance at year end (ending).

That would be,

= 233,000 + 31,600 - 24,200

= $240,400

$240,400 is the Cost of Goods sold for the year so Option D is correct.

You might be interested in
Michelle Lansbury Company deposits all receipts and makes all payments by check. The following information is available from the
Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

The solution is given in the table file attached below

Explanation:

Download docx
8 0
3 years ago
Sara shouppe has invested $100,000 in an account at her local bank. the bank will pay her a constant amount each year for 6 year
katovenus [111]
We can compute this using the Annual depreciation charge
Use the formula:
depreciationcharge= (Co-Cn)i/[(1+i)^n-1)]
where
Co= initial amount= $100,000
Cn- value after n years= $0
n= life of account= 6
i= interest rate=10%
Sunstituting all the values, we will get,
depreciation charge = $12960.74

The bank will have to pay Sara shouppe  $12960.74 for the investment of $100000 with 10% interest.


5 0
3 years ago
What was Thomas Malthus’s theory of population growth?
Rufina [12.5K]

Answer:

A population would grow faster than its ability to feed itself.

Explanation:

Thomas Malthus' theory, in my personal beliefs, is remarkably accurate and quite rational. He argued that if one were to have a country/population left unchecked, as in without any form of administration, government, or central authority to balance it, that a population would thus outgrow its resources and thus result in overpopulation and a lack of necessities... something that may, perhaps, lead to eventual extinction.

This is fairly factual when you think of the contemporary age. The earth was previously believed to have a carrying capacity of about 2-40 billion people, an argument that eventually centered on around 7 billion. Today, the earth's maximum carrying capacity is generally percieved to be about 9 billion people. In this age, we currently are nearing 8 billion.

This. Is. An. Issue.

A plethora of earth's resources that life itself depends on is LIMITED. Our freshwater reserves are limited. The amount of animals on this planet, a source of food, is <em>also </em>limited. The amount of plants on this planet, significant sources of energy, food, oxygen, and all sorts of natural processes that keep everything alive, are, unfortunately, limited.

This demands that humans figure a way to require less of these precious resources, fast. By the year of 2150, we'll likely have surpassed our carrying capacity.

For the issue of food, there are options. The primary issue is that humans are omnivores, as in, we love both plants AND animals... in our stomach's, of course. A prime example is myself! Personally, I couldn't live without beef, but I <em>definitely </em>couldn't or wouldn't want to survive without spinach and broccoli, because they are absolutely delicious.

However, despite humans being omnivores, we stubbornly refuse to eat our veggies. . . meaning a mass majority of us prefer to eat meat. We breed our animals to have offspring, giving us more meat. We generically enhance or even create our meat. We love meat.

The issue being that meat is a terrible source of energy. Remember, energy comes from sources of life itself, like the sun! PLANTS take the mass majority of this energy in, not animals. Animals EAT the plants, to where as much as 80% of that initial energy source is lost, disappearing into nothing, and meaning only roughly 20% is absorbed into the animal upon eating the said plant. Then, and only then, HUMANS come to eat the animal, in which 80% of that initial 20% is also lost between these stages.

As you can see, humans end up with barely any amount of this vital energy, simply because we love meat. We feed the plants to the animals to keep them healthy so WE can then eat the said animals, thus resulting in a HUGE loss of energy. We use our land for pastures. We give other resources (like water) to the animals, again, so we can eventually consume them.

The earth is going to run out of resources at one point or another, but our current consumption habits will likely hasten this process as far as freshwater and food.

Ofc, it shouldn't need to be said that if we were ALL to switch to primarily plant-only consumption, we'd probably be set. Getting rid of all our pastures and replacing them with massive farms would give is a surplus of plants, which are remarkably better sources of energy and will thus be able to sustain humans much, much longer. We won't have to worry as much about starving.

Then again, you must ALSO worry about the fragility of plants. They can easily be detroyed by natural disastors and are dependant upon environmental conditions such as weather temperature, climate, and soil. These factors are very limiting, but then you must additionally remember the amount of care they require, as well as they are extremely vunerable to mass destruction (like droughts, burning, flooding, etc., which can wipe out a LOT at once).

Obviously it's a give-or-take thing.

Malthus said it right, three hundred years ago.

I get the length of this post was probably uneccesary but you asked a very good question that gave me an excuse to cover something in-depth.

I am inevitable.

~Troy

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following might a student do in high school to learn more about automotive care? A.
stepladder [879]

Answer:

Answer - A

Explanation:

SkillsUSA has an automotive "skill" in which students in high school can learn about the automotive industry.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is Patrick Jorgenson? What does he do for a living?
Reika [66]

Answer:

I think you mean Patrick Jørgensen

Explanation:

He is a musical artist and if you don't mean Patrick Jørgensen I'm sorry

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following pricing strategies is most likely to lead to long-term financial sustainability?
    13·1 answer
  • For​ 2018, Franklin Manufacturing uses machineminushours as the only overhead costminusallocation base. The estimated manufactur
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following transactions would be least likely to have an effect on the net income for 2020? A : Stock purchased in 2
    12·1 answer
  • Background material, fact sheets, news releases, and sample photos are commonly found in what important business communication p
    9·1 answer
  • The policy makers of Country LT have noticed a steady increase in grain prices over the last several years. The increase in pric
    8·2 answers
  • Based on the following information, calculate the variable overhead rate variance. Actual variable overhead cost $15,500 Actual
    7·1 answer
  • Procter &amp; Gamble's June 30, 2016, financial statements reported the following (in millions): Cash, beginning of year $ 6,836
    12·2 answers
  • Crystal Displays Inc. recently began production of a new product, flat panel displays, which required the investment of $1,500,0
    12·1 answer
  • One of the biggest barriers identified in the performing stage of team development is the inability of project team members to f
    8·2 answers
  • The entry of firms into a market Group of answer choices Shifts the market supply curve to the left. Increases the equilibrium p
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!