People in the US are resistant to change because they believe their way of life does not need change.
Explanation:
As given, In cultures in which people believe that they can dominate their environment, individuals will tend to take a passive approach toward change. US is one of the cultures that takes pride in its past achievement and does not want to change that way of life that had led them there.
Ironically, the time of the progress in US was marked by such innovations that have defined the nations like China in the modern world now.
This is something that is hard to realize on a cultural term.
Answer:
Goals, methods, and styles of inquiry.
Explanation:
By establishing a comparison between the cultural directions that both law and psychology take, it is easier to figure out the reasons why, on some occasions, psychology and law have not been able to work together, whereas in some others, have been very productive in collaborating. These cultural differences take place because of their different goals, methods, and styles of inquiry.
The Zhou created the Mandate of Heaven: the idea that there could be only one legitimate ruler of China at a time, and that this ruler had the blessing of the gods. They used this Mandate to justify their overthrow of the Shang, and their subsequent rule.
Answer:
1. Find out how much money you’re managing.
2. Track your spending.
3. Set your financial goals.
4. Decrease your spending or increase your income.
5. Stick to your plan.
Television crime dramas have greatly increased public interest in crime and forensic science. As such, juror's today expect more categorical proof than forensic science is capable of delivering. This phenomenon has been coined the CSI effect (Crime scene effect).
The exaggerated representation of forensic science in crime television programs like <em>CSI: Crime Scene Investigation </em>effects public perception. The phrase initially appeared in a 2004 <em>USA Today</em> story discussing the impact that television shows incorporating forensic science were having on trial juries.
Most frequently, it alludes to the idea that juries have started to demand more forensic evidence in criminal cases, placing the actual burden of proof on the prosecution.
Although this is a commonly held opinion among American legal professionals, some research contend that while regular CSI viewers may have a diminished regard for circumstantial evidence, crime programs are unlikely to have such an impact.
To learn more about CSI effect here
brainly.com/question/12000529
#SPJ4