Solution :
a). There is a way to state the question :
If there are two firms, firm A and firm B. Both the forms are same in all the respects but differ in only one thing, that firm A provides job training 1 hour per worker more than the number of hours of training of firm B, by how much the output of firm A would differ than the output from firm B?
b). The manufacturing firms that are located in Ohio will provide the job training based on the characteristics of workers. Some of the determining factors includes years of schooling, experience in a particular job, etc. The firms can even consider the worker's age, race or gender. The training will be provided to the less efficient workers based on their ability.
c). The amount of the capital as well as the technology that is available to the workers would affect the output of the firm. Thus the firms having the same kind of employees would have different outputs when the firms used different technology or different amount of capital.
d). No, unless the training is randomly assigned. The factors are listed above which can contribute to the finding of a positive correlation between the output and the training even when the job training does not improve the productivity of the worker.
Answer:
4. Weighted-average equivalent units will be equal to FIFO equivalent units.
Explanation:
Equivalent units of production is been applied to the work-in-process inventory when an accounting period comes to an end. It can be regarded as expression that gives amount of work done which was recorded by a manufacturer over a units of output which was partially completed after an accounting period. For instance, if there are 100 units that are in process, then 40% of processing cost is expended , then we can say there are 40 equivalent units of production. It should be noted that the if beginning work in process is zero, the equivalent units of production computed using fifo versus weighted average will have a relationship in such a way that Weighted-average equivalent units will be equal to FIFO equivalent units.
.
Answer:
Distinctive competence
Explanation:
Distinctive ability relates to a certain market trait which it does differently than its rivals. Since the company can do more than most other companies, it has a competitive edge over all other companies.
An organization's competitors cannot imitate this competence (at least in the short term), allowing an organization to gain an advantage over others. An organization must protect its distinctive competence to retain its competitive edge.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the given case illustrates distinctive competence.
Answer:
Consumer surplus increases by $2
Explanation:
The consumer surplus can be defined as the benefit that consumers gain when they pay less for a good that they are willing to pay more for.
a). Determine the final demand as follows;
Price elasticity of demand=% change in price/% change in demand
where;
price elasticity of demand=-1
% change in price={(Final price-initial price)/initial price}×100
Final price=$24
initial price=$25
% change in price=(24-25)/25=(1/25)×100=-4%
% change in demand=x
replacing in the original expression;
-1=-4/x
x=4%
% change in quantity={final quantity-initial quantity/initial quantity}×100
let final quantity=y
4%={(y-100)/100}×100
0.04=(y-100)/100
4=y-100
y=4+100=104
final quantity=104 units
Consumer surplus=(1/2)×change in price×change in quantity
where;
change in price=25-24=1
change in quantity=104-100=4
Consumer surplus=(1/2)×1×4=2
Consumer surplus increases by $2
