What are some differences between the glacier theories and Bible accounts of the Flood?

2 answers:

7 0

By the Flood, I'm assuming the one where Noah had to build an ark on God's orders with two of every animal boarding it.

The major differences between these two concepts is that the glacier theories explain how the Flood occurred on Earth naturally, due to Earth's many catastrophic events. The Bible, however, pinpoints God as the primary reason for the Flood by supernatural means. The glacier theories are more factual and have evidence behind it while the Bible is not scientifically proven.

Art [367]3 years ago

6 0

They occur years apart, and the glacier theories is from research and just a theory..but the bible account of the flood is more a story instead of research and science.

You might be interested in

Which of the following describes how polluted water sources would most likely affect one’s personal health?

Bogdan [553]

I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the last option. Polluted water sources would most likely affect one’s personal health since p<span>athogens would invade the body and cause disease, such as giardia. Pathogens would go with the water we take in our body and would disturb the processes inside causing illnesses.</span>

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

An enzyme-catalyzed reaction was run at five different temperatures (trials 1-5). The results are shown in the data table above.

arlik [135]

It's the last one it's featured causing it to produce nothing at 70°c

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following is TRUE about earthquakes?

Vikki [24]

My answer would be "Earthquakes happen along cracks in the earth's surface, called fault lines, and can be felt over large areas"