Group of answer choices.
A. being replaced by videographers.
B. being replaced by crime-scene reconstruction animation.
C. being replaced by security and surveillance cameras.
D. responsible to provide only crucial photographs of the crime scene.
Answer:
A. being replaced by videographers.
Explanation:
Forensic investigation can be defined as a field in criminology that deals with the gathering and analysis of all physical evidences related with a crime, so as to determine the facts and reach a conclusion on the victim and suspect. There are various techniques and software applications or programs used for obtaining and gathering data (informations) about a crime such as ProDiscover Forensic, CAINE, iLook, Sleuth Kit, identiKIT, etc.
In Forensics, the two-dimensional crime-scene images produced by still-life photography are now being replaced by videographers using modern technologies and techniques.
Videographer refers to an individual who is a professional or expert in the production of video-based clips through the use of a video camera. With this technology, forensic investigator are able to gather and analyze crime-scene footages using three-dimensional images or clips obtained from videographers.
This is tricky but I would go with generally, yes.
Side note: However, I feel like that would have some major consequences!^
Answer:
Explanation:
You must lay a foundation for an exhibit before the court will admit it. This requires a particular fact or event to occur before such an item is considered evidence. These facts and events help to show which information demonstrates that the particular exhibit is reliable and can be trusted.
Answer:
Yes.
Under Civil and Pretrial Procedures, the comedian may add the additional intentional tort claim as a supplemental pleading to her already existing lawsuit against the actor. Moreover, the supplemental pleading is very timely.
Explanation:
When the comedian sues the actor for an intentional tort, she needs to show that the actor, who caused the harm to the car, acted willfully and knowingly. That means the actor deliberately caused the damage to the car in an act of recklessness. Since the supplemental pleading for intentional tort is timely, the comedian simply needs to demonstrate that the actor caused the damage to the car on purpose, knowing fully well that his act would damage the car or cause some harm.
