Answer1:an international agreement, usually regarding routine administrative matters not warranting a formal treaty, made by the executive branch of the US government without ratification by the Senate Answer2: An executive agreement is an agreement between the heads of government of two or more nations that has not been ratified by the legislature as treaties are ratified. Executive agreements are considered politically binding to distinguish them from treaties which are legally binding
Answer:
Google
Explanation:
Search it brainly is a scam
Correct answer - Embezzlement.
Why? - Fraudulent taking of personal property by someone to whom it was entrusted. Most often associated with the misappropriation of money. Embezzlement can occur regardless of whether the defendant keeps the personal property or transfers it to a third party.
This statement is true.
In a market with a small number of sellers, known as an oligopoly, each seller's decisions have an impact on the outcomes of the other sellers.
Although there isn't a single theory to explain oligopoly, economists will occasionally employ a model known as the prisoner's dilemma to explain how oligopolistic market outcomes arise.
The prisoner's dilemma is a "game" that illustrates the advantages and dangers of cross-pollination among oligopolistic businesses.
A Nash equilibrium results from a prisoner's dilemma, where each player performs the best they can given what the other players are doing.
Oligopolist businesses frequently face the prisoners' dilemma, where they must choose between engaging in aggressive market-capture competition at the detriment of their rivals or engaging in "cooperation" and coexisting with the rival with the market share they already control.
To know more about oligopoly, visit:
brainly.com/question/3005866
#SPJ4
The answer is amendments. it is in the first amendment of the state constitution
