1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
allochka39001 [22]
3 years ago
7

What are the reasons why warring nations’ goal is for taking the capital of their enemy group over?

History
1 answer:
frutty [35]3 years ago
4 0
In a war you want to consider strategic points to take. So let’s say a battle takes place next to a bridge. If your army controls that bridge than you have a higher chance of victory since you get to decide who crosses and who doesn’t. Now when an army takes over an entire city, than that army can use the assets to its advantage. (Factories, roads, rail roads, runways, etc.) but when that city is the capital city, then that country loses its command and will most likely dissolve.
You might be interested in
2. Explain One way politically in which the Islamic world and World of Christendom
Law Incorporation [45]

Answer:

Christendom was deeply divided: Byzantine Empire and West

a.Byzantium continued Roman imperial traditions

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Colonial trade relied on specialization because the regions were suited for different economic activities. Which colonies specia
elena55 [62]

<u>Answer:</u>

<em>(A) Southern colonies </em>

<em></em>

<u>Explanation:</u>

Colonial America relied upon the regular habitat to address fundamental issues of the individuals and the state. The accessible standard assets gave or managed what every area's new claim to fame would be or turn into.

Colonial America additionally had local contrasts between culture and chronicled explanation behind foundation as a settlement. The Southern Colonies were set up as financial endeavors and were looking for natural assets to give material riches to the motherland and themselves.

7 0
3 years ago
What was one result of russian leaders' resistance to change during the nineteenth century? question 9 options: russian serfs be
saw5 [17]
Thank you for posting your question here. The one result of russian leaders' resistance to change during the nineteenth century is that Russia maintained successful relations with long-time allies. I can also go with "Russia struggled to modernize". I hope the answer will help.
4 0
3 years ago
Which headline took place first?
vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

Enlightenment

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
After the vietnam war, what southeast asian country became communist, then killed 2 million of its own people?
Alla [95]
Cambodia, the murders were commited by the Khmer Rouge.
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does the modern study of history challenge earlier histories?
    6·2 answers
  • The ________ determines the number of levels and managers in an organization.
    10·1 answer
  • In economics what is the major role of buisness?
    15·1 answer
  • How did Bruce expect most African Americans to earn a living?
    15·1 answer
  • Tensions in Europe before World War I were most increased by:
    15·1 answer
  • What were some hardships child laborer in 1900 would have faced
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the British issue the Balfour declaration​
    7·2 answers
  • Culturally insensetive go brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
    5·1 answer
  • Plsss answer all my questions<br>​
    14·1 answer
  • What were the major empires that existed in the 11th-16th centuries?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!