Answer:
The farmar wants to have a say in what products and the end result of production
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the text or the excerpt for reference.
There are also no options attached.
What response? From who? What is the reference?
However, trying to help, we can comment on the following general terms.
What does his response tell you about the Framers' intentions regarding the institutional design of the judiciary?
You are probably referring to Federalists Alexander Hamilton's opinion about the judiciary.
If that is the case, then we can say that Alexander Hamilton wrote the Federalists Paper n.- 78, under a pseudonym, and he referred to the importance of the judiciary. He considered that the judiciary was an important institution to help and protect the people from bad or abusive legislation.
Hamilton also thought that the judiciary was important to enforce the legislation included in the US Constitution. Hamilton thought that the judiciary had the obligation to interpret the legislation to correctly apply it, and also should be the institution to keep an eye on Congress in order to limit it to exceed its powers.
A free-trade zone is by definition “a place where trade is left to happen without tariffs(tax on imports/exports), quotas, or other restrictions”. An example of a free-trade zone is the European Union. There are no tariffs, quotas, or other restrictions placed on trading within the EU countries (they even share a currency). This allows for them to place products at a cheaper price for good quality and still get enough money to grow wealth within the different countries.
Chlorine has the potential to break up the ozone layer (along with bromine)