Answer:
Pulverizing
Explanation:
Pulverizing is an authorized method of destruction.
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
The correct answer is A. Sources without source qualifiers.
Explanation:
In a speech or text, it is important to support major points using credible sources. Besides this, when introducing these sources, it is essential to include source qualifiers that explain the relevance of the source and what makes this credible or the qualifications of this source. This cannot be omitted because the source qualifiers make the source credible and therefore, contribute to the support of your ideas. Thus, to support a point effectively what should not be done is include "sources without source qualifiers".