Answer:
Conflict theorists and functionalists.
Explanation:
Conflict theorists:
Conflict theory is the perspective of social psychologists. It worked on the method of analysis. It is a critical comment on social arrangements of the society Conflict theories are attracting the attention of the power of differentials and this type of conflict found in the class called class conflicts.
Functionalist:
This is also called a functionalist perspective. It is Emile Durkheim's perspective. She was interested in the order of the society and stability of society.
The theory which states that when there are multiple possible explanatons of an event or a phenomenon, the simplest is the best would be Occam's razor.
However, it's important to note that this idea actually states that we shouldn't necessarily multiply ontological entities, which doesn't really mean the easiest solution necessarily.
The correct answer is the yard.
You must have seen in many movies that inmates spend a lot of time in the prison yard, usually playing some sports, such as basketball. It is an important place for prisoners because they get an opportunity to socialize and to wind down a bit, and where they can relax and talk.
Answer:
To support any claim, we need evidence that is in favor. And they are the arguments and explanations that best supports the claim. And those which does not supports the claim, leave the claim uncertain. And different debates will have a different list of evidence and reasons which support, and also a list that does not support the claim. Hence, first find the issue, which is the claim, and then find out what supports and what does not support the claim. And then you can put your words forward. That is the correct way to participate in a healthy debate. Remember, you should either support the claim, or you should be against the claim. And you will have to stick to it till the very end, supporting it with your thoughts and evidence that you can collect while preparing for the debate. The better you prepare, the healthier it is going to be the debate. And you should never be 50-50. You should either agree or disagree. Like if you are debating on climate change, you can either support it or not support it. The bushfire in Australia is a fact that supports, and you can pick it up if you are supporting, and economic loss is a fact that does not support it. You can pick that fact if you do not support it. The point is, you should put forward strong facts, And that makes a debate healthier.
Explanation:
Please check the answer.
The answer is coordinating efforts to rescue survivors.
