1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pshichka [43]
3 years ago
7

In the wake of World War I, the United States was at a crossroads. The war had derailed the momentum of progressivism, and warti

me provisions such as the Sedition Act of 1918 left American radicals on shaky ground. Would the Progressive Era resume? Perhaps sensing that Americans were weary of conflict, Republican presidential candidate Warren G. Harding campaigned in 1920 on the promise of stability. Harding advocated a return to "normalcy" and promised to heal the nation after World War I through the restriction of government spending, tax cuts, and booming commerce. The ensuing economic boom, union busting, and isolationist foreign policy could be interpreted as a return to the "normalcy" that Harding promised.
On the other hand, the 1920s were the "Jazz Age," an era defined by cultural change and conflict. The cultural icons of that era — such as flappers, jazz, the Harlem Renaissance, and consumerism — reflect radical shifts in American thought. It was a time marked by a changing sense of possibilities for both African Americans and women, and a focus on modernity.

In this activity, you will participate in a discussion about social and political mores in the 1920s and make an argument for which title — "A Push for Modernity" or "A Return to Normalcy" — best fits the era.

Discussion Prompt:

Which title — "A Push for Modernity" or "A Return to Normalcy" — is the most appropriate descriptor for the 1920s?
History
1 answer:
aalyn [17]3 years ago
4 0
The aim of this question is to have you weigh the evidence and decide which title best fits the 1920s and be ready to defend your choice.

This sort of question is not one which has just one correct response.  The detailed instructions for the discussion question already give you the outlines of the arguments for both sides of the question.  The value of the discussion activity is to get you to think about the factors on both sides of the discussion and to talk through those ideas as a class.

One possible answer to the question would be to say that both titles fit the 1920s equally well, but they look at the era from differing perspectives.  From the standpoint of mainstream politics (headed by Presidents Harding and Coolidge), the 1920s represented a return to isolationist and conservative policies, with government focused on making the country a good place for business and industry.  From the standpoint of social life and trends, there was much liberalism and freedom being expressed, which went against the conservative mainstream mood of those who held political power at the time. 
You might be interested in
How did the early colonists surive in their new land during the initial years?
mafiozo [28]
They learned how to grow food and survive from American Indians.
3 0
3 years ago
The constitution is sometimes called a “bundle of compromises”What were some major issues that the competing interests compromis
nignag [31]

The Great Compromise

The Virginia Plan provided for representation to be based on the population of each state. On the other hand, the New Jersey Plan proposed equal representation for every state. The Great Compromise, also called the Connecticut Compromise, combined both plans.

It was decided that there would be two chambers in Congress: the Senate and the House of Representatives. The Senate would be based on equal representation for each state and the House would be based on population. This is why each state has two senators and varying numbers of representatives.


Three-Fiths compromise

Once it was decided that representation in the House of Representatives was to be based on population, delegates from Northern and Southern states saw another issue arise: how slaves should be counted.

Delegates from Northern states, where the economy did not rely heavily on slavery, felt that slaves should not be counted toward representation because counting them would provide the South with a greater number of representatives. Southern states fought for slaves to be counted in terms of representation. The compromise between the two became known as the three-fifths compromise because every five slaves would be counted as three individuals in terms of representation.


Commerce compromise

The compromise mandated that tariffs were only to be allowed on imports from foreign countries and not exports from the U.S. This compromise also dictated that interstate commerce would be regulated by the federal government. It also required that all commerce legislation be passed by a two-thirds majority in the Senate, which was a win for the South since it countered the power of the more populous Northern states.


Slave Trade Compromise

In this compromise, Northern states, in their desire to keep the Union intact, agreed to wait until 1808 before Congress would be able to ban the slave trade in the U.S. (In March 1807, President Thomas Jefferson signed a bill abolishing the slave trade, and it took effect on Jan. 1, 1808.) Also part of this compromise was the fugitive slave law, which required Northern states to deport any runaway slaves, another win for the South.

Election of President

The Articles of Confederation did not provide for a chief executive of the United States. Therefore, when delegates decided that a president was necessary, there was a disagreement over how he should be elected to office. While some delegates felt that the president should be popularly elected, others feared that the electorate would not be informed enough to make that decision.

The delegates came up with other alternatives, such as going through each state's Senate to elect the president. In the end, the two sides compromised with the creation of the Electoral College, which is made up of electors roughly proportional to population. Citizens actually vote for electors bound to a particular candidate who then votes for the president.

5 0
3 years ago
What did president carter fail to do
Pepsi [2]

President carter failed to sympathise for the people of his country. Some say that he was greedy and only did what he did to gain popularity. His decisions werent well thought out as well

5 0
3 years ago
HELP ASAP!!
Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
General Horatio Gates won this decisive battle by controlling the high ground at Bemis Heights with fortifications at the Hudson
FrozenT [24]
I think it's the Battle of Bemis Heights.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Question 3. was nixon impeached bcs of the watergate scandal?
    11·1 answer
  • Which two important goals did Congress achieve, based on the authority provided by the Articles of Confederation?
    7·2 answers
  • If there were no system of checks and balances, the process of government would eventually fall apart. Do you agree with this op
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements about the EU is true?
    14·2 answers
  • If X is the center of the circle, find 2004-05-03-04-00_files/i0230001.jpg.
    10·1 answer
  • Mark the statements that are true. Select all that apply.
    5·2 answers
  • Explain the the industrial revolution lead to social and economic change.
    14·1 answer
  • if someone could answer these it would be great. i’m failing school and really need help, thank you:) (giving brainiest or whate
    13·1 answer
  • I Came Here To See When You See Someone Say Something Like “Unwduhwnjjw” random letter or something with a picture don’t click i
    11·2 answers
  • Sejauh manakah faktor ekonomi yang membawa kepada pemisahan Singapura ?​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!