The problems with price gouging laws that keep prices low are:
- Price gouging laws do nothing to address the underlying issues that cause shortages after a disaster. In fact, they often make the problem worse.
- When prices rise after a disaster, producers are encouraged to produce more of the good and bring it to the disaster area; price gouging laws short circuit this effect.
Here are the options to this questions:
- Price gouging laws reduce shortages after a disaster by keeping prices low.
- Price gouging laws do nothing to address the underlying issues that cause shortages after a disaster. In fact, they often make the problem worse.
- When prices rise after a disaster, producers are encouraged to produce more of the good and bring it to the disaster area; price gouging laws short circuit this effect.
- When prices rise after a disaster, consumers are encouraged to consume less of the good and leave some for others to purchase; price gouging laws short circuit this effect.
- Price gouging laws keep prices low after a disaster. This forces producers to produce more of the needed goods
- Price gouging laws keep prices low after a disaster. This forces consumers to buy less of the good than they otherwise would
Price gouging is when the price of a good or a service is increased to very high levels when the demand for the product is higher than the supply of the product. Price gouging usually occurs after an event. For example, after a natural disaster.
In order to prevent price gouging, the government can set a price ceiling. A price ceiling is when the maximum price for a good or service is set by the government. When prices are prevented from rising above a particular price, this benefits consumers as they would be able to purchase goods at a cheaper price. But producers would be disadvantaged because their profit margins would fall. This can lead to a shortage problem as demand would exceed supply.
To learn more about price gouging, please check: brainly.com/question/10477659?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
0.36
Explanation:
Cost of equity of 16.8%,
Pretax cost of debt of 8.1%
Return on assets of 14.5%
As per NN proposition: Cost of equity = Return on asset + D/E ratio (Return on asset-Cost of debt)
0.168 = 0.145 + D/E (0.145 - 0.082)
0.168 - 0.145 = D/E (0.064)
0.023 = D/E (0.064)
D/E = 0.023/0.064
D/E = 0.359375
D/E = 0.36
Thus, the debt-equity ratio is 0.36
Answer:
$181
Explanation:
Given that,
Beginning:
Income tax payable = $54
Deferred tax liability = $75
Ending:
Income tax payable = $34
Deferred tax liability = $145
Tax expenses during the year = $231
Amount of tax paid during the year:
= Tax expenses during the year + (Beginning - ending tax payable) - (Ending - Beginning deferred tax liability)
= $231 + ($54 - $34) - ($145 - $75)
= $231 + $20 - $70
= $181
Answer:
$116,161.616
Explanation:
Given that,
Total interest paid = $230,000
Time period = 30 year
Annual interest rate = 6.6%
Total interest on loan = Loan amount × Interest rate × Time period
$230,000 = Loan amount × 6.6% × 30 years
Loan amount:
= $116,161.616
Therefore, the loan amount is $116,161.616.
N.B: I don't understand your question fully and neither can i find the complete question anywhere on the internet so im going to answer this sentence and hope it helps you.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
When a company has employees from different backgrounds and with different skills set, it helps the company come up with a lot of innovations that cuts across different cultures, thereby expanding their own range of services and/or goods. Also it helps in problem solving as each employee can come to the table with various ways of solving a problem.
This situation can be called diversity of thoughts.
Cheers.
